Why didn't they stop after making the second movie?

Rating: 3/10 (9 November 2018)

Crappy movie.
Why did they wait until DH3 to come up with this story? It seems like they were trying too hard to come up with material. The way the movie was put together doesn't make any sense. Why go through all that trouble just to get to John McClane?
This movie sucks and doesn't make any sense!
I give it a 3/10 because at least they tried to come up with something interesting but failed because the movie doesn't seem put together very well. I like DH2 better. This one didn't follow the same path as the last 2 Die Hard Movies. It lost me with all the boring wild goose chases. It just didn't have the same level of action and entertainment level as the last 2 Die Hard Movies. It felt like they lazily put Samuel L. Jackson in there for comic relief or to serve some kind of strange political agenda. His being in the movie didn't really make any sense or serve any purpose for the movie.