Over-The-Top Action Sequel. Not Well-Filmed Or Acted. A Shame It Wasn't Better.

Rating: 4/10 (6 June 2019)

A very different movie than 'Die Hard' (1988). A new director and the only movie of the entire series to not be written (at least in part) by Roderick Thorp. This is a more adult Die Hard, with more F-bombs, more gunfire, and more gruesome killings. Speaking of gruesome, a lot of the acting in this movie is rather gruesome and would often make me cringe like I was watching Season 1 of 'The Office' (NBC, 2005). Most of the action scenes are completely over-the-top to the point of being nonsensical. So many bullets are fired at John McClain in this film... so many missed bullets.
I don't want to be too negative - I really like the Die Hard series. Sequels are tough.
RealReview Posting Scoring Criteria:
Acting - 0.5/1;
Casting - 0.5/1;
Directing - 0.5/1;
Story - 1/1;
Writing/Screenplay - 1/1;
Total Base Score = 3.5
Modifiers (+ or -):
Believability/Consistency: -1;
Quotability: +1;
Total RealReview Rating: 3.5 (rounded up to 4 for IMDB, because John McClain deserves an extra half of a point sometimes.)