not perfect but still compelling

Rating: 6/10 (20 August 2017)

The thrust of this movie is contained in the lengthy second act within the Algier's Hotel where the Detroit city police confronted several kids with tragic results. There is a third act that follows the legal consequences of those in charge. However, the power of this film is found within that second act. There are some incredible performances from Algee Smith and Hannah Murray (two of the kids in the hotel) and Will Poulter (one of the city policemen). For those, this movie should receive Oscar attention early next year. In addition, the cinematography in many places effectively puts you as the viewer in the middle of the riots helping to build the tension. No doubt, there is a message being sent by this film.
However, it is not a perfect film. The beginning was sluggish to the point of misdirection. It takes a good 30 minutes to engage a few of our main players in the critical phase at the motel. Perhaps, the intent was to build-up to this. It is true, thrusting us into the middle too soon would be equally disorienting. But if you choose to view this film, recognize that much of what you see early on isn't fully needed to pay off the thrust of the film. Secondly, despite my accolades on the acting performances above, some of the dialogue didn't feel natural, but rather somewhat clichÃ©d especially from our city cops attempting to resolve their dispute with the people in the hotel. And lastly, the slow moving and predictable courtroom drama was more than the movie needed.
I was asked by someone as we left our viewing..."Did you enjoy it?" To which I answered..."No, I don't think I was meant to enjoy it...but it is a good movie." It is riveting. It is compelling. It is sad that this history happened as it did. However, there are many times that we may not enjoy something we need to see/hear. Perhaps this is one of those things.
As a post-script--there are some who will say that Catherine Bigelow shouldn't have been the one to tell this story. I am not going to argue that point. I am glad someone did and I DO think she presented a movie that effectively tells a story of our history. I would entertain a different version should that be given to us in the future. Also, there is likely some question as to the portrayal of some of the key players here. Were they accurate to history? Even if not fully accurate, it may very well present a perception of what some have. And perception can and often does become one's reality. To the person attending this movie, recognize this.
B- Mild recommend