Why not? But only 7/10 because it lacks the 'emotions' of Top Gun

Rating: 7/10 (23 July 2016)

Of course it is not a good movie. But again, it is a Top Gun remake. If there wasn't a Top Gun before, this would have been a nice flop.
With Top Gun in mind (the resemblance is obvious, producers wanted a similar film with a different set, it makes this funny to watch.
Exaggerated skin color and setup tints, repeated close ups on Tom's pretty and sad/hurt/cocky face, 'fast action' car race scenes, exactly the same receipt as it's predecessor. Sadly, producers forgot two items: first, the love story (sigh), and second, if you can digest the fighter plane questionable acrobatic/fight scenes, it is much harder for Daytona fans to accept the lack of realism of a real race car.
The film pace is quite well sustained throughout the film.
Nicole is not acting. She just standing or should I say 'postering'
Still, nice to watch with some good popcorn or a big hot chocolate on a rainy day, why not?