It's a shame to have George Romero's name associated with this version at all!

Rating: 1/10 (20 March 2004)

The story had so many holes; questions, missing pieces and throw in an out-of-character moment that ... (I can't say. You have to see it for yourself). The actors tried. You watch to see who is going to live and who was going to die, but when it's over you realize you didn't care. It's difficult to make a remake, but in this case I wouldn't had said anything if the director cheated a little and took some ideas from Romero. "28 days later" took the thunder out of these zombies and that movie, even though the director denied it, was somewhat of a combination of Romeros' dead movies (watch "28" for comparison; it's not 10 times better, just better). The producers threw the equipment and experienced people to surround the new director, but it was a Freshmans' attempt. I had to come home and watch the real "Dawn of the Dead" to get this remake (rehash) out of my system.