A flimsy take on history

Rating: 5/10 (21 June 2020)

Although a well made movie considering the cinematic, the script is poor and as stated before disturbingly historically inaccurate. The script's take on Churchill, and Oldmans interpretation, is a mythical one created as how they wanted it to have been. Churchill is portrayed as a senile alcoholic with a feminine voice and touch that is obviously ridiculing in order to make his persona distorted. Considering that the movie had the prerequisites it had it fell flat in what probably can be interpret as an agenda to distort history in favor of today's general political views.
Feels like an effort to rewrite history for the general public. If you can see past the historical flaws, the movie is some what of a drama from an actual(that was turned fiction) event that runs a flat tire from poorly placed comedy. Entertaining but would not watch again.