Why I gave this 2 stars

Rating: Null/10 (16 January 2012)

It's an impressive movie. I have read a paragraph about it and the idea seems great: a cube. But it's actually a Rubik Cube. One that moves around. The camera is OK, the acting is bad at every tense moment. There is gratis gore and it looks that there might be some creativity with the chambers. 10 minutes pass and the creativity is gone. And the idea fails to develop. What follows is 80 minutes of pure bore in some mambo–jumbo about numbers. The drama side is comic, the horror is just some gore in the beginning and some blood at the end. The sci is about some sliding seemingly metal rooms with a cute design. And the fi, well, that I don't have any explanation for that one. To be sincere, I doubt there is any.
In the end all the threads are loose, there is no explanation for anything. Enough to make a piece of crap seem artsy. And the idea bout the cube? Well, it's all about a smart boy or girl copyrighter who probably spent some sleepless nights trying to make something interesting out of this bore. So one star goes for the copyrighter that made me want to see this junk. And the other one is the default of IMDb, because I'm not able to award zero stars to a movie.
Contact me with Questions, Comments or Suggestions ryitfork @ bitmail.ch