It doesn't even participate in the Word Good

Rating: 1/10 (20 October 2007)

"content and context. The best reviews include not only whether you liked or disliked a movie" -imdb
Well, regarding the content: it did not leave contentment. Regarding context: it is a most con-artistry. As for the text, it is an homage to a technology, not a wonderment of morality tales. Spun of polyfiber and fed as cotton candy, it is as repulsive as rotten meat at a fast food restaurant.
The foolish story of a dead/undead woman who usurps another woman's role as bride is just another veil upon the tale of adultery. Sure, she can play the piano, and "accompiany" him, that princess bride. But where is his wife? Running the gamot of modern culture's insults of morality: within the framework of a morality tale!
LOL at, not with. However, the text speaks of a woman who hit her head, and apparently, she did, and forgot something: amnesia. Seriously, though, when she "comes to," this character, this movie, it is too late to make any point: it is no where near even sustaining itself as worthy of uttering so much as a moral to any story, let alone the history of graverobbery that is the Burtonesque production.
Dancing skeletons, yes. Art project? no.