Hand-held sucks

Rating: 2/10 (6 February 2008)

If the camera hadn't been hand-held shaking through the whole movie it might have been at least an 8, but the filming made me quite dizzy and though the idea was quite good, it ruined the movie because there was no "real" steady filming at all.
Also this hand-held filming took out any excitement and shock-effects.
If the same movie was made with proper filming i might actually consider go seeing it again! The sequel won't get my money if it is made the same way as the first.
It's the first time i actually wanted to leave the cinema before the credits.