Not a Good Film

Rating: 2/10 (24 December 2008)

This film was not good. Why? The cinematography, while I'm sure was carefully planned and executed, came off as sloppy and distracting. The shaking, hand held camera did little to enhance the "realism" of the story, probably because the dialog was so contrived and repetitive. I'd go on to say that the acting could only be called sub-par at best, however I don't feel it's fair to blame the actors in this situation, due to how little they had to work with.
Also, implausibility is a boring argument, but if you're the kind of spectator that is bothered by a filmmaker's disregard for the actual physical rules presupposed by a film's internal structure, this movie will annoy you as much as it did me.
I watched this movie from 12:30 AM on a Wednesday night until about 2:00 AM on that same night, and believe it or not, I probably could have found something better to do with the time. And that is some pretty unnecessary time.