Shaky Cam Hype Disaster Movie

Rating: 1/10 (23 June 2013)

I checked spoilers to warn readers of this highly marketed garbage, that is if revealing a found footage shaky cam vision all throughout is considered a spoiler. You see, I've always been out for top of the line blockbuster movies that is worth every cent. I don't see film greats such as Spielberg, De Laurentis, George Lucas, James Cameron and Roland Emmerich use found footage crap in their films, and even if they did, they used it moderately to make a point, but not throughout. Super 8 gave us a shaky cam feel but it was so blended well with the entire movie you don't even notice it or get epileptic watching the movie. Now I call that pure genius in film making. So far, we have been bombarded by found footage, shaky cam types since it's conception, and most of these types are truly garbage. Should I say more to smash the likes of these films to oblivion? Sure, I'll give you 2 more examples to ruin your appetite. Imagine the movie "Godzilla" (1998) or "2012" (2009) by one of the greatest directors of all time Roland Emmerich, shot with found footage, epileptic shaky cam! Now tell me if you will enjoy it like we all did if it weren't. Cloverfield sucks! If the director tried to emulate the greats it would have never been so bad. It's all hype. I hate to see this movie get a higher rating than a 1. For fuck's sake, we want to see a disaster movie with all the special effects and not from a stupid handy cam. Hey shaky cam directors, there's a lot of people who hate your types of films. Your reign of terror must stop. Stop torturing people with shaky cams. Are you in bed with the eye doctors and the shrinks or something?