Lack of skill and competence from the Director!

Rating: 1/10 (2 November 2012)

I'll start with the positive: Overall the acting was of a good standard. The concept of the story line had so much potential! Now the negatives: From beginning to end I was frustrated, annoyed and confused. I have never walked out of a film before, but this was nearly the first. Frustrated because the director thought it was OK to randomly skip between the past, present and future with no introduction or lead in. Trying to follow the story of maybe 10 characters who apparently have a connection throughout the film required photographic memorey, they just simply did not. I was annoyed with the fact that the Director obviously thought he was doing a good job. Confused. Now I like films that have confusing and somewhat difficult story lines (Inception, Shutter Island and The Matrix etc), I am often explaining the story to my friends in the cinema, and I always walk away happy from them because I feel the Director had done a excellent job in bringing the story together in some form of conclusion or hidden finale.
The random story lines do not link up at all. They are completely random and have no form of sequence or chronological order. Nothing that held maybe a ounce of importance in the film was explained or introduced with any calibre. The fact that the main actors played different roles and characters throughout the film was a complete flop. The fact that the characters spoke some unknown made up English dialect made understanding some dialog just aggravating.
100,000,000USD! - Should have been invested in re-newable energy & fighting cancer!