What was that about?

Rating: 2/10 (27 February 2013)

My visit to the cinema was based on a 7.8 score which I assumed meant it was quite good, I can only assume the people that made it must be making up the majority of the voters
There was lots of good stuff about the film but if the basic story line is so jumbled up it is barely watchable. I hung on to the end hoping that it was all going to make sense but it didn't.
It's a shame they didn't pick one of the separate stories and make that into the film and discard the rest.
My lasting memory of this film will be how can a film of this standard achieve such a high mark, am I so far detached from the rest of the cinema going public?