Gypsies are not Romanians

Rating: 5/10 (29 April 2007)

Although it was a good movie, I'll give it 5 out of 10 because of the way the Hollywood producers treat the ethnic problem in Romania. I saw a good deal of movies where Gypsies speak the Romanian language, consciously mistaking them(The Man Who Cried is another example, out of many). This is very harmful for Romanians, who are DIFFERENT than Gypsies. They live in our country too, but they are spread all over Europe. They have their own tradition, they respect their own laws and this is a big problem for the Romanians, being considered Gypsies and pointed out wherever they go. Can't these Hollywood producers do a film where the Gypsies speak their language (which is totally different than Romanian)? Excuse me if I can't see the loss or the disadvantages in that.
Another problem is that in the film, almost 50% of the immigrants (in the Bexville prison) are Romanians or Gypsies (doesn't seem to matter). I mean, England was the only country standing all over the Globe and all nations tried to escape there. Is this supposed to mean that Romanians are 50% of the global population?
I should mentions other intolerable facts but it will became boring. In the end it is cruel, how some people mock us, straight in the face (i bet that in P.D. James' book not all immigrants are Romanian).
Hoping that this will make a small difference...