Overly-long, self-indulgent twaddle

Rating: 2/10 (19 November 2006)

Am I the only person in the world who found this new Bond film a total disappointment - with more flaws in it than a Manhattan skyscraper? Instead of coming away thinking how good a film it was, my thoughts were along the lines of: "If I were not watch that again (which is VERY unlikely), I bet I could list at least 50 flaws in that film!" Totally unbelievable rubbish with a 'super-hero' who never displays any of the after-effects of fights, poisonings, or any other setbacks.
How so many critics could have praised such overly-long drivel in a genre where new standards have been set by the likes of the Jason Bourne films and 24 is totally beyond me.
Don't waste your time or money on this rubbish. They are far better spent on buying and reading Ian Fleming's original novel.