Nothing good about this movie..

Rating: 2/10 (17 January 2007)

i am sorry to disappoint those that might read this and haven't seen the movie, but its just not worth the money, time or effort. i have seen all bond movies at least 3 times, and beside the last movie of pierce brosnan this was the worse of them all! actually i and also my friends didn't like pierce brosnan portrayel of bond but daniel craig is worse. to serious like he is acting in the movie munich and not in an action thriller. yes daniel craig is a good actor, don't get me wrong, but he just wasn't a bond as we all got to know, maybe in the next movies he will improve.
about the movie, it was really a mess, horrible editing in my opinion, especially the end was messy and with many holes. another thing i didn't like was that it didn't remind me of any bond movie i have ever seen. 1) almost no beautiful girls, not the kind that anyone will remember. 2) no q Branch, no moneypenny. 3) almost no jokes, movie is to violent and to serious. 4) no brains used by bond, just fight after fight. 5) the game at the casino was long and boring, should have been edited. 6) almost no gadgets which are james bond's trade marks. 7) to many commericals in the movie, cars of the ford brand, stuff of sony like computers and many cel phones. 8) no proper bad guys, the bad guy in this movie is really lame, had almost no conflict with james bond, and is shown as a small time thief thats after 100 million dollars or so.
this movie is just not a bond movie, and not a clear action movie, i have no idea why a person should go and watch it, yes there are few nice scenes of action here and there but as a movie it just doesn't stick.
one last comment, i have a feeling that some or most of the people commenting here in favour of this movie are maybe from the movies PR, cause me and friends i saw the movie with all agreed that it wasn't a good movie, so really weird that some think it was, especially after all the FACTS i pointed. well there is one more option maybe they like some of the critics from the papers are just not intelligent enough to see through a bad movie. 2/10