A good Action flick...but the 007 fuel is missing

Rating: 5/10 (24 November 2006)

I agree with the person who says that people who are rating this film 10 out of 10 must be hired people by the production or something. It wasn't that great! Everyone's so determined to love this movie because it's James Bond. Personally I think Pierce Brosan, Roger Moore, and of course the legendary Sean Connery were the best bonds. I liked the old genre with the lasers and super villains and cool gadgets because thats what Bond was about! It's like if you took the harry potter movies and took out the magic and tried to make realistic: it would suck! Not that this movie wasn't a good action flick it's just that as a bond film i think it was no good. Also Daniel Craig is seriously a bad bond: He looks un bondly, he loses his cool several times in the film, and he's too dark. Anyways many people disagree with me but i'm going to stay loyal to the old bond.