Daniel Craig Although A Good Actor Is Too Old For The Part

Rating: Null/10 (16 December 2006)

Everything else has already been said about the movie so I will comment on the lead actor who I think is all wrong for this franchise.
Daniel Craig is too old an actor to portray a young Bond especially if they want to make further movies. He is almost 40 but he looks considerably older and even if they buffed him up for the part he still looks too old.Botox? And he also has a Slavic look about him that is a bit distracting.Gez I seem to be tearing this poor man apart but they did throw him out there as the next saviour of the Bond franchise and he took the bait. Rightly or wrongly he is James Bond ...for now.
A younger actor of say 25-30 would have been better as he could have matured along with future movies.I heard that Henry Cavhill was being considered but was too young/pretty(?) or perhaps not experienced enough BUT truthfully Craig is just not Bond material and PLEASE that does not mean he is not a good actor.Let's face it , he just isn't charismatic enough to pull this off and horrors! I cringe to say this NOT GOOD LOOKING ENOUGH. I recently saw him in Enduring Love (2004) and even in that where he played an author with glasses and a satchel , he still looked like a geeky gangster and I kept thinking "This can't be the next James Bond!!" And yes he was very good in the part.
Will there be another Bond Movie? Well they had better hurry as Craig is not getting any younger. Apparently one is to come out in 2008 so we'll see how that fairs at the box office. This one was quite successful but I'm not sure it was for the right reasons.