Slow-moving, superficial, plot less

Rating: 4/10 (17 October 2005)

Having read In Cold Blood and most of Capote's other novels (as well as a good deal of biographical material), I'd have to say that this movie DIDN'T COME CLOSE to penetrating the psychological depths of this historical/literary event. Suggesting that Phillip Seymour Hoffman is going to be nominated for various awards for his performance in this movie is probably correct, but this fact doesn't necessarily warrant such a bestowal. Oftentimes, especially in Hollywood, mistakes are made when it comes to such things. Aside from affecting a Capote-like lisp and beholding people with an aloof, yet studious gaze, Hoffman neglected a lot of other Capote-isms, like his excessive squirming, and the sheer drunkenness of his person, etc. In my point of view, although Hoffman held a drink as a prop in every scene, the level of intoxication wasn't captured. nor, when PSH claims to feel a close connection with perry smith, does the claim appear to be based on any events or actions that had preceded. in other words, the "connection", or bond, between the two was never fully established.
the only indication that a bond was forged was when Capote-Hoffman says so (paraphrase) "i feel so close to him." this doesn't cut it for me. the viewer should be able to intuit certain bonds long before they are voiced or spoken by piecing together subtle clues that in this flick, were entirely absent.
aside from showing perry smith biting his lip (which was intended to make him seem less-than-killer like, exposed, humane) they never really delved into his character, showed other instances of his humanity or lack thereof. in short, i was BORED STIFF by the superficiality of the rendering. boo.