How can Interview with a Vampire have a higher score than this masterpiece?

Rating: 10/10 (2 December 2016)

Really makes me depressed to see how these scores play out on IMDb. How stupid and ignorant are people?
IWAV had one single good thing in it: Kirsten Dunst's performance. The rest was bland, boring and camp, with a miscast Brad and Tom... Utter, forgettable nonsense.
Bram Stoker's Dracula has: A good, epic, romantic and emotional story. Great dramatic qualities. Beautiful visuals. Amazing score. Great production design and direction. Fantastic (Oldman) to OK (Keanu - born to play Neo) performances. Nice mix of classic old genre clichés, and inventive storytelling. An interesting villain, and a great ending that keeps you thinking about it. Also, one of the best vampire origin prologues ever.
The movie is timeless and will never feel outdated, because of Coppola's vision, direction, and the art department... Pure visual candy, and an emotional ride.
If you disagree, I feel sorry for you, because you are one french fry shy of a happy meal... You are emotionally lobotomized... You are wrong in so many ways... Shame on you! Read more, study more, feel more... Just do something to make your soul come alive again, because this movie deserves at least an 8.
OK, maybe a bit overreacting there, but you get the point... I hope.