Should have been called Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula not Bram stokers Dracula But still GREAT

Rating: 10/10 (16 May 2005)

The only two mistakes the director makes are...
1. He calls the movie Bram Stokers Dracula, and it clearly isn't. For example the movie is filled with sex and in the book the word is only mentioned once.
2. He chooses Keanu Reaves for the part the part of Jhonathan who is, don't get me wrong a good actor just not in this movie.
otherwise there are no other mistakes.
Other wise the movie is Excellent, Wynona Ryder does an awesome Mina, Anthony Hopkins is exactly how Van Helsing should be, and holly crap Gary Oldman does the most memorable performance i have ever seen (besides most characters played by Jack Nicholson, am i right? ) he does an awesome Transilvanian accent, and he brings a very creepy presence to the screen .
Altogether Dracula is excellently set, awesomely acted, and very underrated mostly because people expected the same old Dracula that has been told maybe 13 times, this movie is new, different and brilliant! A strong 10/10