Not the happiest review, from a big fan.

Rating: Null/10 (5 October 2017)

The only explanation I have for the new Blade Runner to be so bad is that they are trying to bring down Hollywood, admitting it is rotten to the core. Or everything is so overpaid nowadays there is no longer money to create masterpieces, no money into consultants, no effort and everything resides on marketing. A futuristic science fiction work must have at it's base the scientific potential to let us dream about the outcomes the future might bring us. When something comes up that is completely detached from reality and is an impossibility we are dealing with fantasy. The design of vehicles are poorly thought, without caring if it is practical, etc. It's bad, really bad. Shallow characters, the story is not engaging, a long boring mess. The appearance of a gigantic ballet dancer hologram in a narrow street is just stupid. Not attractive, ineffective and makes no sense in every single way. Movie looks older than the original. An attack to the cyberpunk genre and science fiction in general. The approach to thematic questions is done as if by a kid in the 80s. It's a long boring mess with little content and the way the narrative goes does nothing to be engaging, like a bad dream. Director Riddley Scott, a legend in the history of cinema, the time has come to retire. Surrealism doesn't fit in science fiction. This movie is like Bees without flowers and projections without projectors.