It Was 3 Hours Lon----------------g

Rating: 3/10 (31 December 2017)

The limited plot makes this follow up to "Blade Runner" seem endless. Now fanboys will thumbs down my review but I am correct. The film was too long for a plot that was razor thin. The same story could have been told had this filmed differently. The action moves slow and people seem to just go room to room in silence. Every scene starts in silence.
In this film the Replicant's seem to know to pose a huge threat to mankind because they might be come life after all and thus eliminate the need for man! So goes the thinking of the people in charge.
This film starts off with a discovery of bones that can be traced to Rachel. But what happened to her and Deckard?
There is many theories why this film bomb. Mine is that the core fans of this film is over 40 and they hardly go to movies anymore. The running time is 3 Hours and that is too long for almost any film.
The old film has a loyal following but it is small following. They are rabid but they are small in numbers.
This film could have been better. If the pace of each scene was paced faster we would of gotten a much better film.