Not bad... but obviously too slow.

Rating: 7/10 (9 October 2017)

Most of the movie is pretty good. But I'm just going to write about it's 1 major flaw. The pace.
So, I'm reading about how this movie isn't reaching "box office expectations". Really? You think!? One of the main issues with this movie is the same reason why the original Blade Runner bombed at the box office! Why would you make the same mistake twice? Look, the movie was not bad but it's WAY TOO SLOW. Did it really have to be? Why? Preserve the style, legacy or some such other b.s? At least it could've been slightly faster than the original but it's actually slower. What was Villeneuve thinking? As an aspiring filmmaker I'm blow away. Because I can tell you that if you told me what the budget of this movie was and had me watch it before release, I'd have been VERY worried.
I don't get it.