Disappointing

Rating: 7/10 (7 October 2017)

Blade Runner: 2049
The sequel to one of the most inspiring films of the science fiction genre, with one of the best directors that currently has the cinema, makes this film in one of the most anticipated of the year.
After 30 years, Deckard (Harrison Ford), we begin with the story of a young Blade Runner, called "K". You will have to investigate a story very mysterious, that will be intertwined with their past, too.
Let's start with the actors. Ryan Gosling, as "K", is the best part of the movie. Sademos that Gosling is one of the best actors of the film, currently. Harrison Ford as Rick Deckard, also is the best part of the movie. It is a pleasure to see a character after 35 years. And for me, those were the most important actors of the film. The truth is that none surpasses the other. The two are very uneven.
"Nostalgia, a feeling of pity for the remoteness, the absence, the deprivation or loss of someone or something dear." In this film they exploit this. But not exploit it for evil, exploit it for good. The photography and cinematography is very close to its predecessor. And that is something that I liked a lot.
The film does not abuse of special effects, like its predecessor. The truth that it does not bother me. The truth is that I quite like.
Here we start with the bad. The duration of the movie. The movie lasts 2:43 minutes, easily last 2:00. I do not know if this is a SPOILER but I warn you. The film is passed 2 hours in a character in the film that to us does not interest us both. We want to see Deckard not to "K". If they had done a Spinn-Off. And the film feels a bit boring without Deckard.
Dennis Villanue is one of the best current directors, I said it before... But the film makes it very long. Unreasonably long. Although the feeling of nostalgia that puts you, it works very well for the film.
8/10 Disepcionante. Expected much more from this director.