The most interesting part of the movie was...

Rating: 5/10 (7 October 2017)

...the return of the giant Atari sign from the original Blade Runner.
OK, quick story synopsis. Bones found of a Replicant who's given birth. How was it possible and where is the child (now adult)?
I'm sorry, but having waited 35 years for this movie it just didn't press any buttons for me. It's an hour too long, the story-line is weak to non-existent and doesn't get answered, the theory of Deckard's origin is again teased at but not answered (even though there really is very little in the original to point to him being a repilicant).
This is another SFX over substance movie. Looks good, although very dark in the 3D version, but there just doesn't seem to be the energy and edginess of the original. It all seems too NICE.
Having seen the original movie over 30 times, I'm not sure I'll bother returning to this new story. I have to agree with Rutger Hauer about trying to add to a perfect movie.