what's all the hub-bub? Strictly second rate sci-fi

Rating: Null/10 (7 March 2002)

The casting is atrocious. While the scope of this movie is impressive, and the future it portrays is realistic and dismal, the actors just don't bring across any emotion. Acting? Uh, no. No acting here. This film could've possibly been saved if Harrison Ford had been replaced as the lead. I've never seen him perform an acceptable acting job, and Blade Runner is no exception. I heard someone comment on the philosophy of this movie... Puh-lease. All in all, worse sci-fi movies have been made; that's not the point. The fact that this movie is regarded as a classic is what's pathetic.