ONE DAMN FINE ACTION/HORROR FLICK!

Rating: 8/10 (31 March 2002)

I commented before, but seeing that some geekey FANBOYS are poo-pooing this movie as the worst they've ever seen...Folks....do you do what I do when you read such cliched crap? I go into their comments on other films they rated to see where they are coming from in their taste in movies to say such INANE things about this flick...YEP...that figures....People who say stuff like that think 3000 Miles to Graceland is GREAT STUFF! Talk about a movie that is pointless, gratuitous, etc, Others who whine and moan cause it didnt follow the formula of the first...OH POOR BABIES!.....go play a video game or something you nerds....its 2 years LATER....Do you do everything the same today as you did 2 years ago in your life?...WHY SHOULD ALL VILLAINS BE THE SAME?... Jeesh.....get one first (a life) before you comment on charactor, plot, developement in a movie. Blade II is a stand alone, grab ya by the you know what action/horror flick....the CGI ROCKS! The first CGI scene where Blade is fighting one of those "Ninja" VAMPS WAS/IS INTENDED to be identified as CGI renditions! It was an artistic choice on the directors part to cross animate in a LIVE ACTION FILM! NOWHERE in the rest of the film is CGI noticable and obvious when used (Even though we know when cgi is taking effect) In closing....Dont just read some blithering cliched comment without going into the users file and reading ALL their comments to get an idea on their taste in movies..(mine included)...AND FINALLY...All these are just opinions...but MINE carry more weight in logic and reason than MANY of the others.... ;) FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF by GOING TO THE MOVIE if the subject matter INTERESTS (YOU)!