How was that different from Clash of the Titans?

Rating: 5/10 (25 February 2018)

Its tacky to rate a movie when there are many fine elements well positioned. Its a Marvel story so we dont have a choice, its a Superhero movie and anything goes. So here's what I thought "Will I want to see the movie again?" Or enjoy to see again? I guess not. Now will I want to see the movie "Rush" Niki Lauda and James Hunt - yeah! How about Ironman 'Yes'. Thor? About maybe, sure. Captain America? Maybe not.
Whats the difference? Great movies have great actors that can carry the persona in a cool way. You want to see that action again because you love the character. Actually, you can watch Black Panther in the theatre, and then forget about it - without desire to see it again.
Another take is, for Africa to map up, it must measure by European Standards - like "Wakanda". One always takes a legacy to build up fiction. Iron Man has a legacy of American technology, more like Vision and its imaginable. Africa doing a Wakanda isnt a vision, its something that can be a joke, as in "In your dreams". What I mean is there's a yardstick of how it must be and then its all illusion to make someone feel important - who hasnt really shown any such attribute themselves. Th 90+ rating on review sites frankly bums you up for Black Panther. If it was a white guy, this movie's rating would be 25%.