RT Critics vs Audience : TFA 92%-90% Zootopia 99%-95% Deadpool 84% 93-% BVS: 30%-75%

Rating: 8/10 (26 March 2016)

As a general rule i always go to see a movie as soon as i can and always WITHOUT read any critic prior to go to the theater. With this movie i can't be more satisfied with my choice as if i took for true the critics opinion i wouldn't see a good movie. You can see the percentage of the title, how is possible that biased results? There is no consistency at all. This movie is not perfect but any measure but is not that bad as critics promote. First you have to be clear that this is a Zack Snyder movie. In that way this guy has a strong preference to make his movies as a kind real life graphic novel. If you understand that you will see that, this movie fit exactly in what was supposed to be. A lot of scenes are meant to give you a taste of a graphic novel product. And he succeed in that apart because some scenes are truly remarkable. But to do that he has to use many times an slow pace, that is not a critics preference unless the production of the movie says Scorsese or something that make them look smart. The rhythm of the movie is the most recurrent problem according critics. As usual with critics the movie has no storyline, my grandpa write better, my version of the plot has no holes and all that repetitive stuff. Consider the point of graphic novel and you see that this movie is consistent with previous Snyder works like 300 and Watchmen. In that order this movie has the same approach, is not that fast at the beginning and look for give an extended explanation of what will happens. Maybe that is it bigger sin, as the most of critics are looking for a roller-coaster start, a Disney linear and simple approach. In no other way you can accept a 100% note for Zootopia and just a 30% for this. I see the two movies and the mammal film is not that good and this one is not that bad. Linear?That doesn't happens here. Here you have many changes that cut the story in a way that maybe is hard to understand to usual critics but not hard to read at all. About the acting we found a very good performance of the most of the cast, specially Affleck who gives a very strong Batman, maybe too merciless for purists. Cavill is good but he is a little plane, need to be more emotive. However he is the physical resemblance of the comic book character so you don't make a big deal of his acting. Gadot is beautiful and her scenes are plenty of actions. Not Linda Carter but not bad at all. Her upcoming movie look very promising. Alfred is a good one in my opinion and has a more intrinsic relation with Bruce, not just advising Batman but helping at all level. The CGI is good for the most part and as happens with other movies the problem in my opinion is using villains with no defined form. Doomsday is a kind of messy aspect very powerful but messy. There are a few poor looking effects but not enough to disqualify the whole movie. In the end, you see that opposite to the 30% of RT, the audience is given the movie a good 75%. The movie has hefty 2.5 hours run, but is good enough to take that time very fast. Overall, this is a movie that deserve to be seen as it will lay the foundations to the DC Expanded Universe.