Awful

Rating: 1/10 (24 March 2016)

This movie sucked donkey-balls. I would've probably rated it 5/10, but since 'someone' apparently speculates in boosting the scores on IMDb, I've taken the liberty of going all in on the opposite side of the scale. Notice how practically everyone who's written a review with a top-scale rating has created their IMDb- user within the last few days. With a Metascore of 44 and a Rotten Tomatoes-score of 33% (same as Paul Blart) you KNOW this sucks, but I went ahead and saw it anyways... Don't make the same mistake as me! It's a sad world, where people try to save a movie that sucks. Instead of owning up to the fact that you've made a terrible movie, you try to boost it up to make money. It's also very sad, that IMDb apparently doesn't have any type of security when it comes to booster-scams, since it takes 10 seconds to realise that the scores on this "movie" are just waaaaaay distorted (check out the average score, by clicking the number of votes below the overall rating) and if you click a couple of the top rated reviews you can see just how resent the "user" have created the profile.