Batman V Superman exactly why.

Rating: 1/10 (25 March 2016)

This is truly an awful movie. If you last two and a half hours plus you are rewarded by the promise of a sequel.
What makes this awful starts with the director or editor, who ever had the the say on which scenes go where. So many were interchangeable, it was like they were randomly picked up off the cutting room floor and assembled. Often the parallel action didn't seem or need to be parallel.
The acting verges of atrocious. Ben Affleck joins a long line of wimps playing the caped crusader. Does Henry Cavill have any expression. Amy Adams runs around lost as Lois. Jessie Eisenberg is more obnoxious then threatening. You would think he would own a more sophisticated timer. Holly Hunter is miscast. There is an often overbearing score that is another distraction.
There is the usual who are these bad guys that must be dispatched. Even with guns they choose hand to hand combat with Batman.
The movie is way too long and the beginning way to slow. The only economy was no "s" on versus in the title. So why exactly was Batman mad at Superman? And after plenty of trite dialogue they become friends again because they have mothers named Martha in common. Just when you thought that conflict was resolved Lex Luther unleashes the Kraken or the equivalent of the Pillsbury Doughboy.
With so much Kryptonite floating around the smart money is betting on Batman. Actually the smart money belongs to those who pass on this overblown over hyped movie. Even if you see it for free, you'll never get that two and a half hours back.