Slightly better than Man of Steel

Rating: 4/10 (26 March 2016)

Just saw this movie today in 3D. I had booked the tickets a week in advance but after seeing the reviews in the past few days, I was feeling a bit doubtful. Nonetheless I wanted to see for myself what was so bad about this movie.
So it started off with batman's background story. Fine.
Then it went onto Superman's background story (from Man of Steel)...with the addition of Bruce Wayne. I could have missed it but, I still have no idea who Mr Wayne was trying to save, therefore, I still don't understand why batman could possibly be mad at Superman.
Lex Luthor. I feel like they were trying to revive the Joker with this character. And I did not like it at all. Lex Luthor is supposed to be smart and a good strategist but not crazy or pathetic. His hatred for Superman was also not well reasoned or explained.
Lois Lane is as bad as ever. Amy Adams really does not suit a superhero movie....
Anyway enough about the cast, the 3D visuals were not good at all. Even the commercials which ran before the movie had better 3D effects.
Batman also was responsible for the deaths of many people (in the kryptonite scene and Martha scene). Batman shouldn't kill!
Why did Batman lure that monster back to the mainland where a lot more destruction could take place? The only positive thing which makes this movie better than Man of Steel was that all the fight scenes took place in an abandoned port so there were minimal loss of lives.
So why 4/10? well I gave Man of Steel 3/10 and this was a small step up from that.