This is getting a lot of unfair criticism

Rating: 9/10 (23 March 2016)

So after waking up today to the jaw dropping 37 percent on rotten tomatoes, my expectations were really down, then I watched some reviews, they were even lower, then I watched the movie, and now...,I'm so happy. Let's talk about the performances, they were all great, Ben affleck is great, Henry cavil is great, Wonder Woman was the best, the visuals were great, the characters were well written, and they tried to tell more than just action sequences, and they succeeded, I read some posts about how incoherent the movie is, and I would go of to say that every thing fits in well like a puzzle. Here is what bugs me, people say that this is long and humourless, like what the hell do you want? Do you want to see batman tell a stupid joke? Do want superman to start throwing jokes like a marvel movie? And if they did, everyone would say that Dc is trying to copy off marvel. They say the writing is lazy, but in the avengers( for example) they inexplicably and out of nowhere saved the day by some tesseract stick nonsense. So avengers age of ultron had a 75 percent on rotten tomatoes by being nothing but a 2:30 hours of action and jokes and setting up 4 future movies, but batman vs superman can't setup 1 movie? Why? Is it because it is dc? And not marvel? I want to deliver a message, watch this movie, and then watch ironman 2, Thor the dark world, avengers 2 and ironman 3, and tell me the world is not fair, I genuinely, honestly and without a doubt feel bad for dc, I can understand why people fought over man of steel, but this is a whole new level