Eisenberg knocks it down to a 6, but grudgingly.

Rating: 3/10 (5 April 2016)

Wanted to see this early on and also wanted to wait for what type of reception it would get. Didn't really get a strait answer.
"Was it interesting?" It seemed to bend over backwards to be interesting. Plot is busy and cluttered. Characters are what you would expect for the most part.
1.5 out of 3.
"Was it memorable?" Most of the acting was better than expected. With the exception of Lex Luthor (and annoyed at a lack of a promised more buff Wonder Woman), I would like to see more of these actors reprise their roles.
2 out of 3.
"Was it entertaining?" The action (when they get to it eventually) is impressive, though can be a bit excessive on effects. Surprising how Batman doesn't have any real fight scene till the third act.
2 out of 3.
Starting with 1 (because it's part of my continuity), 1 + 1.5 + 2 + 2 = 6.5 Eisenberg knocks it down to a 6, but grudgingly. A re-cut or re-edit could probably do wonders for this film, if not just cutting it into 2 films.