The superheroes are the reviewers who lead us to believe this movie deserves 4 stars at most! CRAP MOVIE!

Rating: 2/10 (21 April 2016)

I went out to the lobby to check and make sure that this was the same movie that actually got ratings higher than a 5. How do people get away with saying how much they were disappointed by the movie, but still rate it a ten? Are they giving it a "Sympathy" vote because it is a DC comic attempt at a movie, rather than a Marvel movie? It almost became "Me vs The Cinema", as I was going to ask for a refund of my ticket price! I can honestly say that I have felt like walking out of a few movies, but was ready to run out on this one... HORRIBLE, GARBAGE, and if I were to be given a DVD of this title I would use it as an ice scraper in my car. How much farther can Superman and Batman movies sink? ... not much farther than this one folks.
What kind of valid rating can be constructed of reviewers who agree that this movie was not the best, yet give it a ten star vote on the rating system? Are you trying not to hurt anyone's feelings, or damage the self esteem of the people responsible for putting this crap on the screen? Review after review relates that this is not the best movie, yet they rate it 10 stars? This is like observing an Olympic diver bounce off the board and perform a "bellyflop", and give a 10 score for the height of the splash! Where do these votes come from? Someone please pay me a few bucks so that I can throw a few bogus reviews out there. I can write things such as:
"IT IS AN OVERLY LONG, BORING PIECE OF WORK WITH NO REAL STORY, BUT IT WAS JUST WHAT I NEEDED TO GET SOME SLEEP IN A PUBLIC THEATER! 10 STARS"
"IT WASN'T AS GOOD AS MOS 5X, BUT SO MUCH BETTER THAN WD40! 9 STARS!"
"THE HEAT IN THE THEATER FELT GREAT, AS IT WAS BELOW ZERO TEMPERATURE OUTSIDE! 10 STARS!"
"I REALLY ENJOYED THE PREVIEWS OF COMING ATTRACTIONS! 10 STARS!"
How does this crap get produced? A great deal of special effects, but they forgot to add a decent cohesive story. My friends tell me "You must be a fan of both universes to understand the movie" I say "Bulldinky!!" All the buildup and publicity, the secret chatter about the production... What a load of horse crap that was. THIS FILM IS A TOTAL WASTE OF 2 1/2 HOURS!!! I would have liked it better if it were 1 1/2 hour long, because I feel that I would not have wasted the extra hour that I did waiting for the movie to suddenly "Get Better..." before it ended. I read both Superman and Batman comics as a kid, and let me tell you, if the comics back then were half as bad as this movie is now I never would have bought another DC Comic. If there is a comparison of DC and Marvel these days it is that DC Comics has a problem telling a story if it isn't referenced in a book as an inside joke known only to the select few people who read the small print.. Waste of time, talent , money, effort, and blank film. Steer clear of this piece of crap movie, and wait until something better comes along like King Kong vs Curious George, because you will never recover the time you spend trying to stay awake for this gem...