Never Trust These So-called Critics

Rating: 10/10 (23 March 2016)

I am not a fan of DC or Marvel and I always watch the movies that produced by them. I have watched the sneak preview and I definitely love this movie as much as I enjoyed The Dark Knight. This movie gets darker than I expected, and I love it, just like Watchmen. I truly understand why the so-called movie critics have been criticizing this movie so much mainly because they embrace the idea of Marvel cheesiness, lame jokes and funny atmosphere. But, come one, this is Batman, the Dark Knight, and why the heck the movie has to carry sense of humour, like Marvel craps? Screw those so-called critics.
There are few things I wish to highlight when it comes to movie critics: 1. Movie critics can be bought or bribed, in many forms, e.g. cash, vacation, sponsorship. And this is not a secret any more 2. Are these movie critics that influential? 3. Critics can be bias, and their point of view can be very subjective, so to say, it's a matter of they like this piece of movie or not. If they like, they will give tons of reason; vice-versa, they will just come out tons of ridiculous excuses. 4. These critics mostly embrace the idea of Marvel's cheesiness and lame jokes, look at their comments such as "not funny enough", "not meant for kids", "too dark". Come on, shouldn't a critic be more open-minded and celebrate the idea of diversity? 5. If you really follow the logic or rating system of this Rotten Tomatoes, which means Sharknado is more welcome than The Age of Ultron since Sharknado is racked higher than AoU? Seriously 6. Why there is a huge split between these critics and audience? Do these small group of so-called elite represent the large group of audience? 7. Do these critics read graphic novel or how much they know about cosmic? Are they good enough to judge a comic book movie? I seriously doubt it