Nice Artwork but not intense

Rating: 7/10 (8 August 2012)

Hi all.....I am here to discuss you about this Tim Burton's batman.First of all it should be praised for its fine art work though its mostly comical and like a toy thing(after seeing Nolans series).I know it is unfair to compare these two as the time frames were different with obviously Nolan having a better advantage of technology and CGI.But the depth is some what not so intense in this Batman movie. One more applause to the person who wrote the dialogues.They are pretty good and catchy.Performance-wise I would say Pfeiffer stole the show followed by DeVito and lastly Keaton himself.I find him very incapacitated or unable to let out his expressions thus lacking dialogues.May be Bruce Wayne's character is such where his alter ego goes suppressed in terms of expressions. I am pretty interested in Batman movies after watching Nolan's series.So i cant rate this more than 7 as per character development,story depth and intensity.It is mostly comical at times with the characters mo-to not given so much depth.Wonder Y she transform's into cat-women after that fall sounds like she is mad. Christopher Walken deserves a special mention as his performance is shrewed,subtle and selfish.Highly capitalistic and manipulative.He is shown as a corporate giant who tries to use corporate style crime's for his benefit. Music was O.K reflecting the dark theme.Bottom Line-Great artistic setting's,comical and not that intense.Lighter vein taken well be children under 15 and a few adolescent's.7/10