A Tim Burton film, more than a Batman film - which isn't necessarily a bad thing

Rating: 7/10 (14 September 2014)

Re-watching the two Burton "Batman"s I was shocked to find I liked
"Batman Returns" more than the 1st. True, the film has nothing to
compare with the wonderful over-the-top craziness of Jack Nicholson as
the Joker, but in some ways Nicholson so overpowered the 1st film that
it felt out of balance. At the same time, and – for me – even more
problematic were the very un-Tim Burton like touches (the Prince songs?
the endless, not very exciting climactic battle, the weak CGI) that
seemed grafted on to make some studio executive happy.
"Batman Returns" seems much more a Tim Burton film; weirder, more
perverse, funnier and more unpredictable than its predecessor. While
the film lacks Nicholson's magic, it gains a great, funny, and
twistedly sexy performance by Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman, her dark,
dual personality mirroring Batman/Bruce Wayne's schizophrenic
existence, and drawing these two "enemies" together like moths to
flame.
Also fun and often fascinating are Danny DeVito's so pathetic you could
almost like him, but so dark he's unredeemable Penguin. And Christopher
Walken is a blast comparatively underplaying evil capitalist
billionaire Max Schrek.
The film looks gorgeous, arguably better than the first. And if the
production design can't match the grandeur of Anton Furst's sets for
"Batman". these have a lot more Tim Burton surrealist
fun-house/nightmare aesthetic.
What's missing is much of a clear plot, story elements coming and going
a bit randomly. And, like the first film, "Batman" himself is made less
interesting than the bad guys. But Burton has always been at his best
exploring outsider characters, and creating nightmare dreamscapes, and
he gets to do a lot more of that here. As one critic put it; this is a
somewhat weaker "Batman" film, but a much better Tim Burton film.