Didn't really need Holmes

Rating: 10/10 (25 June 2005)

I loved the movie, well written and easy to comprehend how Bruce Wayne became Batman and why. And the twist of who is real enemy is was very well scripted. I'm not sure why Katie Holmes was in it though, she wasn't totally necessary. Did she add anything to this movie? Not in my opinion. I'd be really surprised if she was in the next one, since she didn't do much in this one. But I gave it a ten, and I'm definitely going to buy it on DVD. Perhaps someone here can explain one issue I had...in the first Michael Keaton movie, Jack Napier kills his parents, but not in this one. Or did I miss something there? It seems that the killer was some no-name thug, which obviously doesn't coincide with the Michael Keaton first, "Batman" movie.