The second most ridiculous movie after "Transformers"

Rating: 1/10 (23 May 2015)

I disliked the first "Avengers" movie quite much, but thought to myself "well, this movie is not about the plot or the quality, it's about big explosions and interesting fighting scenes that you only get if you break the laws of nature" I would not have watched it a second time, but then I saw that the sequel "Age of Ultron" received ratings from 4-5 stars from any source I'd seen so I gave it a chance. .... To quote "Family Guy": The last thing that got me THAT confused was "Transformers 3": "Why do they still allow these guys to make movies???" .... This movie is for children, not for adults or anything between! Eight year-olds might forget about the repetition, the redundance, the lack of anything a brain is made for. And that's OK! This movie has around the same amount of content as a Disney Channel production, when I was a child I loved the Disney Channel. But nobody would give a Disney Channel production a HIGHER rating than "Interstellar", "Gravity", "Sweeney Todd" or "Ex Machina" (and yes, also "Avatar")! .... It is OK, if the user-rating is merely an indicator for the profitability of a movie, this is a big help for anybody who wants to create a movie. But in my opinion it is the responsibility of so called "EXPERTS" to give a rating based on QUALITY and ARTISTIC VALUE! This is necessary to promote movie-companies' effort on creating innovative and sophisticated movies too.
Because money will always be more attracted to popcorn-cinema, at least our and the experts' respect should give those who really put effort into making a great movie, and who sometimes take great risk, the reward that they deserve.