3D technique still must improve and is not hard sci-fi

Rating: 7/10 (7 February 2010)

Here I just wanted to mention that I don't understand why they still use, in a 3d movie, depth of field in order to get this 3d effect. The main problem is that you think you are seeing something real, but then you focus on something in front of you that is blur and remains blur. Then you realize is not real, is a flat movie. When you see something real and you put your focus on it you see it perfectly and when you are no putting your focus on it, well it doesn't matter whether is blur or not. The movement should be slower (or at least different) as gravity is lower there. And the last claim is that the world is too close to ours. Darwin wouldn't have accept it. It is much closer to the lord of the rings than to 2001