what is Kevin Costner thinking about 'Avatar'?

Rating: 9/10 (19 December 2009)

okay, so the first part was terrible, really awful. it reminded me at 'Dances with Wolves', and though I really love that movie and I'm a big fan of Kevin Costner, I just couldn't believe what James Cameron had done: Cameron took 'Dances with Wolves' and mutilated it into 'Avatar', a film of which he says he's very proud, that it's groundbreaking and that it's opening the portal for future generations, making 3D-movies. ri-i-i-ight... let's start with the special effects: they are known as ow so huge, but I didn't saw a zip. another thing: I'm half blind, my left eye is dead, so I really didn't have anything with that three dimensions effect. ow, so the director wasn't thinking on pleasuring people with sight disabilities? I would say he didn't. but let's forget that fact, and concentrate on the story: it's bullBEEP, it's nothing, I couldn't care less about what was happening, the storyline was unsatisfying and the pace was way too slow to keep me interested a single bit.
but the second part of the movie was unbelievable good. it swept me away, I was sitting there with my mouth open. not the special effects were admirable, even though some may say they were, but the story was really interesting, I wanted to know how it all ended. one could say the second part saved the movie for me, now I totally understand why it's such a wave. let's embrace this movie and give it all the awards it could get.
still, I'm wondering what Kevin Costner is thinking about Avatar, because it's only his 'Dances with Wolves' in a science fiction coat. nevertheless, both were great movies, but I've already seen 'Dances with Wolves' seven times, and I'm hoping I will never ever ever have to watch 'Avatar' again.