why so much critic?

Rating: 9/10 (16 January 2010)

I am aware of there will always be critics. but I have read some reviews with a lot of critic. And I must say, you disappoint me guys. A lot of people says, that because of the movie took 12 years from the writing to the finish, it could not live up to its expectations. I simply hate the word expectation. Would it have been any better if it only took 5 years to make? lets say you had not heard of the movie, and you went to the cinema to watch it. Tell me, would it have been any better then? And by the way the 12 years was not just 12 years of film making. it included expanding the technology of 3d and other. If Avatar is gonna be followed as predicted, it will take much less years, because the graphics and the characters is already perfected.
I have also heard that some people thinks that the plot and dialog was too unoriginal. If it is not original, there is a reason why it has been used in other movies (and works), and why take the chance after 14 years of hard work, if people don't find the originality any good. (By the way, I think that there are a lot of originality to offer in this movie.) The movie did not leave you with any tricky thoughts or exciting mystery which has been solved. That kind of movie, can i only watch the first time being excited about it. I could kill to watch avatar again(not literally), because of the super effects and the many emotions all around the film. at last I want to say that the 3d was brilliant, and the actors performed flawless. Good job James.
9/10. And i am not even a Sci-Fi fan. But James Cameron also likes to call it an Action-Adventure-Fantasy ;)