Sheer waste of 300 million

Rating: 2/10 (19 December 2009)

James Cameron's Avatar was publicised and marketed well....the film got a thumps up from the critics all around the world.....After watching 2012 & experiencing one of the best special effects in my life ,i hoped to feel the same for avatar as well.
However,i was very disappointed after watching this mega budget movie which had very few to offer.Below are the negatives:
1) Pace & Length of the movie : The movie was 2 and half hours long.i have no problem with the lenght.however the movie was very boring .the first 20 minutes is wasted in useless dialouges.the movie picks up the pace in the final 30 minutes.
2)CGI : I was not at all impressed with the 3D CGI...I was expecting something mindblowing in terms of effects just like 2012....however that didn't happen.....I was wearing glasses and didn't feel anything real as mentioned by all the critics....I didn't feel any difference in the 2d version & the 3d version of the movie....the effects used in the films were no where near to 2012
3)Story: It was a meaningless and predictable story....It became repetitive in the middle and don't feel like movie is leading anywhere.....Only the last 30 minutes were worth watching......
4) No good dialouges I don't recommend this movie to any1....It's a sheer waste of money exactly the way James Cameron did with this movie......