Honestly Disappointed

Rating: 1/10 (9 August 2013)

I felt kinda insulted when I finished watching the movie, seriously. Did they(production side) think viewer are stupid enough to buy the so- called-beautiful CG, that they couldn't see that the story was a ripoff from any other films ever made? Many people said it was a ripoff of 'Pocahontas', but I, as someone who haven't watched it(Pocahontas), could tell that it must be ripoff.
The animation (CG) was wonderful, there's no denying that. But the story... ugh... even from the first ten minutes of the movie, I could tell most of the overall story. Seriously, I didn't quite remember myself, but I think I've heard the story somewhere, if not from 'Pocahontas', then many other movies (I've ever watched) blended into one (yes, even Smurfs).
And the most disappointing part is that; I expected much from a movie that was directed by someone who has name (and a BIG one on that), generated with so-called advanced CGI that was developed over ten years research, and blahblahblah. But all I got was just deja vu all over. It's almost like they're too damn serious developing the CG, and then, when they finally succeeded, they realized that they didn't have good stories to be plastered with. And the solution is to 'get inspired' by some movie clichés.
Seriously, Cameron, we're not stupid. If you think you can distract everyone to love the movie just because the CGI, then, think thrice. Yes, thrice. One is for whether everyone would love the CG or not. Two is for whether everyone would realize the movies which stories has been ripped off for the sake of this one junk. And last, is for whether everyone would realize the pile of movie clichés and fall asleep. That's three.
And no, I don't recommend any of you to watch this junk. 164 minutes is too damn long for a piece of junk. I was seriously regretting my decision to watch it (and donwnloaded it before).