You make the masterpiece Titanic, then make the overrated Avatar

Rating: 2/10 (20 March 2013)

I gave it a 3 for the special effects and some what good 3D, you know what make that 2. I have never in my life been so disaponted with a movie and I saw Hunger Games, The Human Centepede, Saw, Hostel, and Symon Says. When I started the film I thought I was gonna be amazed with this so-called masterpiece. Some one here go to MarkMusic.Webs.Com then go to MarkMusicOfficial profile then tell me what the hell is so magnificent about this film. Nothing here was anywhere close to original. DaltonO Jun 14, 20103 Eh, yeah its all 3D, yeah its got allot of special effects and costs allot, yeah its got blue alien boobs, but other than that there is nothing here. Terrible cliché, hole-filled plot leaves you bored. Its kind of amazing how you can have such a crappy plot and waste 4 hours on it. After you watch it you think its good at first, but that is just an effect from the CGI and 3D. Soon you will realize how lame it is. "the Eywa sees you!" ugg soooo cheesy. I legitimately have no idea how this film has been getting so many positive reviews. Someone once said great films were a combination of technical innovation and artistic achievement. While Avatar certainly nails the technical side, it's artistic half leaves a lot to be desired. A by-the-numbers cookie-cutter plot with poor writing and awful dialogue. While a beautiful movie to look at, the intense CGI cannot hide the hopelessly derivative story and generally poor acting. While the world of Pandora is nice to look at, it is poorly thought out. All the characters are caricatures of the worst movie stereotypes. We have the badass soldier chick, the angry army commander, the hero who just wants to do the right thing, and the industry crazed maniac. It took James Cameron 2h 40m to tell a story that Disney managed to tell in half the time. A typical piece of American shoot up em senseless piece of trash. Cameron has stolen ideas from a range of films and merged them into a silly unbelievably juvenile plot. Lots of violence and a story with nothing to say. Writing and dialogue are amateurish with characters that seem to be taken from comic books. The only thing that makes this film remotely watchable are the special effects. Movie making at it's worst. Shame on the critics who didn't have the courage to pan this gross waste of money. Cameron was reminiscent of Michael Bay's dedication to special effects in this incredibly clichéd and (with regards to plot and characters) lackluster film. The characters all filled positions of clichés, leaving nothing unexpected through the entire plot. I found myself predicting lines and events before they occurred, a feat which never leads to a good feeling about a movie. The special effects were phenomenal, but everything else seemed less important. This movie was straight up god awful. The story was consistently boring throughout the movie and it had a totally unoriginal plot line. The characters got on my nerves to no end (especially Sigourney Weaver's character) and we're supposed to believe that this far in the future, they are still using crappy wheelchairs that look the same from the ones in the 70's? Being a person who is not at all impressed by just special effects, I was extremely disappointed in this film and James Cameron. I literally took about 10 bad reviews and put them together thats how much I have to make up for, but maximum of 1000 words so let me go edit it down. Nevermind Im good, but how does someone go from the masterpiece Titanic to Avatar. Even his film Sanctum was better then this crap.