What makes Avatar different?

Rating: 4/10 (2 February 2010)

simply nothing and its point shows me that if you have a lot of money and a poor script you would make a film that was called as "the best film" or "a cinema classic". There is nothing new in Hollywood. They are still using same issues, same clichés. The only interesting thing about the film is its budget or technical background.
I think except its visual quality, it is a waste of time. When I started to watched it, at the beginning I guessed the end of the film and general course. If you have 400 millions of dollar you would make the best film experience!
Its point in IMDb is an unfair for many other best movies of all time. But if you think that visuals are everything but not script you can watch it.