Great eye candy, but doesn't stimulate the mind

Rating: 7/10 (6 April 2010)

alright, i get it. "omg the cinematography was amazing!" "the graphics are revolutionary!" blah blah blah.... yes, the graphics were off the chart and i thought it was essentially eye candy (and i still think it), BUT that was all it was.
i saw the 3-d imax, and i was so psyched to see this. however, when the movie was done, i left with nothing. usually a good movie will leave me feeling happy, excited, sad and etc. this movie...nothing. i din't care. the story line was so tiring. i'm the type of person to love action and love graphics and all that good stuff, but this movie (even with all the action and graphics) din't really live up to hype for me. i regret wasting money to see it in imax 3-d, i wish i saw it in a regular theater and saved my money.
i ended up not caring about the characters. the acting was alright cuz hey with graphics like that the acting will be overlooked by a majority of the public who watched it. people who say this movie's storyline was the best or up there with the other greats is truly mistaken. you're just comparing it with the greats because of the hype surrounding its ground breaking cinematography and technology that was used to create this movie.
i rate it a 7/10.