Enjoyable blockbuster

Rating: 8/10 (19 December 2009)

Are the cgi, the plants, planet, navi, animals amazing? yes! Overall the movie is entertaining and a "blockbuster" at its highest level yet. This is American cinema. The plot can be from a cartoon, because the percent of university doctors and classical musicians that are watching this movie is not very big. And the movie does look occasionally very shallow, and naive. I agree with all the negative comments about the dialog and the storytelling. Sry, I'm not a troll, I was a huge fan before I saw it. I saw it, and enjoyed it. But don't get me wrong, the whole thing is enjoyable, and in places gorgeous and emotional. But overall storytelling and dialog is peterjacksonish naive and shallow like the lord of the rings, return of the king ending style where we start to look at each other and smile to each other, and get closeups of the faces. I can't even imagine, how you can compare this movie to "alien" or T2 in any aspect. Cameron has changed. See the Spielberg interview where he talks about Stanley Kubrick in you tube. Where Kubrick questions, why do one make a movie, what is the reason. There is a place in Avatar movie about the floating mountains that is there because it is "cool" that is the only reason. There is a shack near the floating mountains, where we have to go, so we have a dialog "Have you heard about the floating mountains? Oh, I can't wait".. "you should see your faces, this is jurassic park" Today we but this in the IMDb-s top next to shawshank redemption. sry for my bad grammar.