A wannabe deep movie

Rating: 7/10 (14 November 2016)

Very slow paced, trying too hard to be deep and dramatic.
I enjoyed the movie, but I don't think it's that good as everybody tries to make it.
My reference for deep and meaningful sci-fi story telling is Contact with Jodie Foster. That movie has so many layers and so many things to say and so many characters to transport the messages (because Contact has many), while this one has one simple message, which is milked to death already: work together for a better life and future instead of fighting each other.
And that message is brought to you on a lower grade school class level. What I mean? The world is divided into 12 parts and every part gets some data, which they have to share with each other and put together to get the result that probably will save humanity(?).
Just like when the teacher splits the class into groups for a school project and every group has to solve a partial task and put together their results to get the answer.
This movie is just like Interstellar. A pseudo intellectual movie for half informed book-smart people, so they feel themselves good for understanding and enjoying it while their "dumb" friends complain about it.
I don't even start on things, like "how exactly would learning a language change how you experience time" and "why does everybody act like they would carry the problems of the world on their shoulders, when they have absolutely no reason to do so from their point of view"or "how doesn't she remember in the future what she said in the past to arrive in that future until another person in the future tells her what to say in the past to get into that future".