This is terrible. How is this considered a classic?

Rating: 2/10 (21 March 2016)

I love all the other films in the Evil Dead series, but there's no getting around the fact that this one just sucks. I get the feeling that anybody who considers this film a "classic" either saw it when it came out and enjoys it purely for the nostalgia, or was raised by one of these people and forced to watch it over and over again until they felt the same way as their mentally challenged parent and/or guardian.
The "comedic" aspects are borderline-retarded slapstick that are the cinematic equivalent of a man making funny faces to amuse a newborn child, the "action" sequences are aggressively tepid and hardly worth watching, and the only "horror" to be found here is the aforementioned horrifically unfunny "jokes".
And it's not even that I don't enjoy unrefined humor, at east when it's done well. It's just that seeing a man make funny faces and voices while getting hit in the face... isn't funny.
Some of the other reviewers noted that this film as a "copious amount of gore", which sincerely makes me wonder if they watched the same movie that I watched. There's practically none here at all compared to the first two films.
Anybody who says that this is the "best film in the series" deserves to be rounded up by secret police and summarily executed in front a firing squad to protect the general public.