A poor propaganda millionaire Hollywood

Rating: 1/10 (28 February 2013)

The only thing I liked about the film were only brief Middle Eastern, recreation of 80 style decade both technology and the looks of the characters. The film exudes the "American Dream" all the time, imposing the image of power "civilizing" of the U.S. over the rest of the world, exalted in opposition would be wild and extremist fanatics.
What I dislike about the film is that beyond being a propaganda itself is very poor performing and history. Recreated fairly unrealistic and boring, just getting a touch of suspense in the final scenes. It seems too lean budget that was, who won awards: Oscar for best picture, and the big news he had. I think in the film foreshadowed the joke of that: implicitly a good press can mount a fake movie. In this case seems to be an irony, in case of a movie Argo false recreated this time to rescue asylum seekers, if not whitewash the CIA.
Cast, all the time gave me the coldness sensation of all they wanted to convey emotions the actors, the script seems pedantic. It's ridiculous the mixture between the environment and the characters in Hollywood, wanting to contrast with Islamic fundamentalism, on that screen almost perfectly divided between the America of the '80s, and Iran of "apes fundamentalists".
For the protagonist, using very basic psychology, indirectly trying to forge the image of the CIA are good people with morals. Example with those scenes and shots where he misses his son Tony, is entirely to mark a marketing and humanization of the CIA. As these guys are obviously people mostly heartless and unscrupulous holders and the macabre minds who led the genocide in Latin America and the world.