Ignore the haters. It's a must see movie, a true gem, a great cinematic experience.

Rating: 9/10 (12 April 2015)

Foremost of all, just ignore all haters. It's a must see movie, a true gem, a great cinematic experience. I am a steady follower of IMDb movie title review segment. And I have true respect for most of the experienced IMDb title reviewers, for their great knowledge, taste and love for the movies. Usually, IMDb title review discussion is a must see section for me, before selecting a new or unseen movie. It aids me to choose great movies, from the huge ocean of the world movies. But unfortunately, on a number of occasions this formula of giving importance on title review before watching a movie, goes terribly wrong. In case of Argo (2012), it took place again. Merely two of first ten title reviews of this movie, reviewed in a positive fashion, the balance of the seven were haters. But how come? Specially, for such a great movie, like "Argo", I don't understand. I've gone through some of the bad reviews and point out main reason which they identify as negative aspects of the movie. Let me cast my opinion on that alleged issue, which I acknowledge.
Most of the haters questions about factual accuracy of the event. Their allegations mostly like; this and that did not occur in real event or politically biased story telling etc, etc. Remember the objective of a movie is to entertain people by telling a gripping story on a 70mm film, not educating people about history, unless it is an educational documentary or video. A director could add or deduct anything in his story in order to complete a good movie according to his own satisfaction, irrespectively in case of a true story or in a fictional story. And a movie should be judged on its merit. Of course movie makers has their own responsibility towards society, that is a different issue. In case of 'Argo' it is a brilliant cinematic adoption of the actual event, my rating is 9 on 10.