Aquaman or Rajnikant 2.0? Atleast this CGI roller-coaster will please every Marvel fan!

Rating: 5/10 (23 December 2018)

I have mixed response after watching this flick. First the visuals.
I watched Aquaman in IMAX with Laser and it was nice. This resulted in bright images, especially the oceans, projected by dual projectors on the giant 42 feet high, 65 feet wide screen of IMAX, completely using the whole screen with no chopping the picture. The images are larger than life, but they don't confuse the eye or strain the vision of the audience. Along with 12000 Watts IMAX proprietary sound system that was used very well for the sound editing. In a nutshell, a Picasso masterpiece of visuals.
Where is the character development? And where's the mission? The first half was nice, especially the script falls flat. It was more like Slaughter-man to me. I mean, what was Aquaman's weakness, to begin with? Black Manta's father shot him with a launcher and it seemed that it bothered Aquaman like a mosquito bite! Seriously, if Manta was not part of the movie it would have been worse.
For Superman, it is Kryptonite. Then why Aquaman was punched and KO in Justice League? At least there was a twist in the middle of JL.
Or pure female fantasy? I mean it was nice that Meera's character was not portrayed as a damsel in distress. She was looking sexy in the tight suit but why forced feminism? Why did Atlanna cry when both brothers were fighting? Rather she just saw her son going to 'bars" without a tear in her eye. Arthur and Meera going to Africa and Italy seemed like they were planning on a honeymoon!
Verdict: Avatar+Tron+Star Wars+2.0*
My score is 4.5/10 but I will add 0.5 since the visuals were far much better than BvS and JL. And I watched The Dark Knight as it commemorated a decade recently. No DC/Marvel movie has even came close to that masterpiece. Sigh!
*Rajnikanth can do everything and anything, and Aquaman is no different!