Does it get any worse than this sensational,over-hyped garbage?

Rating: Null/10 (11 December 2003)

Absolutely, the worst film I have ever seen.The plot is as thin as the celluloid it was put on.The acting..OH please!..don't even get me started.Al Pacino was obviously miscast for his role...he basically spends his on screen time YELLING his lines.Also, Cameron Diaz was SO damn cheezy as a team owner...her acting..or lack of acting was so horrible I had to put my hands over my eyes.Due to Oliver Stone's nauseous filming style..the rapid choppy editing,ultra-cliched/ultra-stereo-typed characters and so on, distanced us from the characters.As a result, the characters are rendered as "walking corpses",completely unlikable.Last ,but not least,the full frontal male nudity was not at all a necessary part of this movie.How did this movie end up with an R rating? Probably, because their are more women on the MPAA board.The lingering frontal male nudity would be the equivalent of showing a woman laying back, with her labia spread, and clitoris exposed...and I wonder what rating this would have received.