The end of the movie spoils the whole (bad) movie

Rating: 3/10 (22 May 2009)

The movie is bad: bad science, bad plot, bad timing, bad texts. Tom Hanks is one of the few reasonably good things (he looks good, his acting is not bad).
Scientifically, the movie is stupid. Antimatter for a bomb? Noooo...
The plot is stupid. Why would the bad guy think of such an elaborate scheme just to hit the Catholic Church? If this guy, who even became the "number two" of the Catholic Church, has access to everything in the Vatican, it would be so easy to bring the church to its knees. No, for a good movie it has to be done as difficult as possible.
Timing: cannot be. Racing around Rome like that is impossible. Taking action like that is impossible. Being right all the time about vague clues is almost impossible. Come on, preparing actions like this is also impossible.
But the end of the movie... when it is revealed that the camerlengo is the bad guy, this really is stupid. He has done everything to help the good guys. And now he is the bad guy? Ridiculous. His centerpiece of evilness was the antimatter bomb. But he brings it high into the sky himself. And goes down to the ground with a parachute and survives. Why would he himself stop the destruction of the Vatican, what was his prime goal. Unbelievable. Stupid.
I gave the movie a 3 instead of a 1 because of the wonderful views of Rome. The camera-work is excellent.