Unimaginable awful!

Rating: 1/10 (4 July 2016)

Watching a war movie from Clint Eastwood like this, can be disappointing for a 50 y/o man like me who has grown up with this director's films. Unimaginable awful!
The opening sequence can tell you whole value of a movie. We have a naive mother and child in opening sequence, with a grenade and she sends her child to throw the grenade to a big group of American soldiers who were moving forward... then American sniper shoots the kid and subsequently the mother takes the grenade to do the unfinished job and... one another shooting from the sniper... HURRAY! Isn't it really funny?!
1- Why the Iraq fighters sent the mother and child to do that? Couldn't it be doubtful a mother and child to be seen in war zone of Baghdad?
2- Why the mother and child act so clumsily?! (she gives him the grenade so slow and obviously!) They want sniper to see them, or us to see them and give rights to the sniper?! (Lol!)
3- Why the Iraq fighters didn't throw the grenade from the roof of the building? Did they have to do it vis-a-vis?
4-How far can a child throw a big grenade like that? More than 20 feet? So can't the soldiers see and shoot him from 20 feet? and do they need a sniper to shoot?!
5- Why the mother didn't do it by herself? Did she want her son to be killed first?! Was she a mother or a robot?!
6- Why the Iraq fighters didn't use RPG instead that funny grenade? What can a grenade do for a few armored trucks?
All the questions are about goofs of just first sequence. Isn't it really childish to script like this by Eastwood? I think I don't need to continue to analyze rest of the movie. The first sequence was clearly awful enough.
The Iraq fighters didn't need to send a mother and child in front of an army. Eastwood needed to send them! Because somehow he wanted to justify killing lots of kids by real Chris Kyle. But I am sorry for Eastwood, because that way didn't work for me and many others also. It was too childish and ridiculous!
We have just two kinds of people in this film: Good, Good, Good People (American veterans) and Bad, Bad, Bad people (Iraq people)! The good people are paid young men who have traveled 10,000 km far from their home country to protect their own country, by killing the local children! But the bad people are some idiot, "savage" and non-paid people who even kill their own children and don't know even how to fight and use the weapons. They are very very bad, because want to kick out the good people from their home country!
At the same time we have a particular person in this story who is not bad, is not good too. He is a hero! He kills children and women from the close distant skilfully, he is a faithful Christian who never reads bible, a good father who believes he must kill people of 10,000 km farther country just for protecting his own children. He even can kill the sniper man of bad people, without seeing him in his own gun- binoculars. This person doesn't go to have battle with enemy due to patriotism even, he just believes that "United States is the best country in the world"! (Lol) We must commiserate if all American heroes are HOLLOW like this one!
Eastwood has even falsification of history in this film. Real Kyle joined military in 1999 (before Sep.11 2001 attack), not after that. But Eastwood has changed it, because he believes that if we see Kyle made decision to join military after Sep.11, we can make more empathy with his brutal purposes! And perhaps Sep.11 attack has been a reaction against some brutal actions of heroes like Kyle, in real history.
In "American Sniper" we have a hero who comes from a family that father sees whole world as a jungle with wolves, sheep and dogs! Growing up in such a family naturally makes children like "savage" animals! Perhaps that was the reason why being a cowboy and living normal life with people couldn't make Kyle satisfied, and he decided to join military to enjoy his own "savage" character.
I wish I was 12 y/o boy! "American Sniper" is a best war movie for 12 y/o boys who always play "Counter Strike" (video game), without knowing "the reason" of fighting. This film's sold more than 500,000,000$, so it means that you can find huge number of people with 12 y/o mentality in America! I think it's needed to grab simple-minded young people from US to provoke and deceive them in order to send them to Iraq (and not showing how and why Kyle was killed). American military always needs some new veterans in Iraq anyway!!
United States is a country where artists of Hollywood are politicians, and politicians of White House are actors! Politics are more preferred than nation in US. That's the reason why after 26 years living in US, I left that country for ever.
If I new about this production before start to making of the movie, I would recommend Oliver Stone to make this film, not Eastwood! Oliver Stone at least lies subtly and credible! Propaganda film is not Eastwood's job.