I don't understand all the hoopla over this flick...

Rating: 1/10 (1 February 2000)

I just saw the nc-17 version and I am trying to understand what made this movie objectionable to any audience. There were a few rather crude scenes, but nothing we don't encounter everyday on television. I expected to see a real skin flick and only saw a short scene with bare breasts. Ratings people, get a life....I don't like teen movies where the teens look like tweens and older. This film is grossly overrated. The infamous "Pie" scene was a joke. Does anyone believe that the erection he has is real? Hollywood relies too much on pseudo-realism and this movie isn't. There is no redeeming social value and little entertainment. I was disappointed.