a good reason to allow a rating of (zero) on IMDb

Rating: 1/10 (3 July 2007)

I watched this without any pretext or expectation. I went into it fresh, without anyone telling me anything about it or reading any review or "hype." I had an open mind, which I always do watching a show for the first time.
To log in here and find this waste of 2 hours on the top 250 really woke me up to the fact that just because a movie is highly rated on here, doesn't mean a damn thing. What it DID tell me was that the majority of people using this site have INCREDIBLY different taste than me. In fact, maybe seeing this movie helped me more than I know. I will be extremely less influenced by the rating system on this site. Because, for me personally, this is the absolute, hands-down worst film I have ever had the displeasure of seeing. I was actually ashamed of myself after viewing it for watching ALL excruciating 2 hours of it. I wish I had those 2 hours back. The characters are predictable, over-the-top, underwhelming. The acting was easy because all the characters are cliché. And besides the hateful feeling I have toward this film, in a way it left me with absolutely nothing to think of afterwords. There IS no message here. The plot holes are so gaping that I won't even start to explain them. I think the greatest insult to this film is to call it mediocre. I think the producers were maybe looking for that "love it or hate it" feeling in viewers. But to give this piece of trash an emotional response would be doing them a favour. So I hate it, but only because it wasted my time. And I would rate it a 5 just to show my lack of an emotional response, but at the same time I can't bring myself to lie to IMDb users and tell them it's even worth seeing.
This film is best left forgotten. Done. I no longer acknowledge its existence. Memory deleted.