I haven't seen anything... have I looked too close ?

Rating: 6/10 (23 August 2000)

The reason why people loved this movie is probably that it conveys the image of revolution everyone dreams to lead : the revolution against the social laws. According to me, this idea is far from being new. I agree with the painting of the American Society (and actually of many western societies), that Annette Benning embodies. Her character is very well described : the woman may be willing to free herself from the social laws, but not able to do so, because no one has ever told her how to do. While her husband is able to follow his feelings, she cannot free her mind of some material concerns like money and image. Her character is actually the best part of the film.
About Lester, I would say that his character is not so true. The whole movie suddenly crashes down when he tells the girl that he is happy. This happiness isn't well described in the movie : is it made of music heard in a car, and of marijuana smoked with the neighbour ? This seems a bit fake. He doesn't have any relationship with anybody. He is lonely, or at least the movie doesn't give us any clue about him having friends. The whole movie is supposed to criticize the American society and to explain how to escape. Only the criticism is good, thanks to Mrs. Burnham and Annette Benning. The movie is based on Lester Burnham and Kevin Spacey, and I think it is in fact its weakness.