I think this movie was a great career move for "Gore"!

Rating: Null/10 (28 July 2003)

I have to say, I was worried about "Gore"'s career before "Alien: Resurrection" because he seemed to be appearing in so few movies lately. Of course, there was "Se7en", but he only had a bit part in that. Anyway, like I said, "Gore" made a good decision signing on for this movie. This is definitely "Gore"'s best movie.
Do you find the above paragraph a little strange? Well, believe it or not, it's true, because gore seems to be the main character of "Alien: Resurrection. It certainly isn't Lt. Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver), playing a character who was already killed off in the last one (but hey, logic doesn't matter when it comes to producers making money). After you see "Alien: Resurrection" you'll agree that gore has the most screen time in this pathetic excuse for a movie.
The 'story' focuses on Ripley being 'resurrected' (or cloned, but they decided to go with a biblical reference) because the company needs the alien to use as a weapon. The alien, of course, gets free and starts to kill off everyone on the ship. Only Ripley (who is now Super Ripley because of a weird bond she now shares with the alien) can save the human race from the alien!
The only thing I was ever confused about for the Alien movies was just, why is "The Company" so eager to get a new weapon? Throughout the entire series I've never heard of any opposition there is towards The Company, and The Company seems to be the dominant ruler of the Universe. So why are they so eager to get a new weapon? Oh yeah, I almost forgot about the whole "Producers Who Want More Money" thing.
"Alien: Resurrection" is one of the biggest disappointments in cinematic history, 3.5/10.