This movie should be called Alien IV with special guest appearance by The Predator.

Rating: 1/10 (28 January 2005)

How do you say "crap" in Italian? You say it "Paul W. S. Anderson! Where to begin? My mind cannot calculate the vast number of inconsistencies and horribly improvised "artistic licensing" crafted by this so-called visionary director. I have visions too, when I went to Tijuana last year and was slipped a pill of Mescaline in my beer. Maybe Anderson wrote this hunk of garbage during a similar night!
Now down to the facts. I have read a number of other comments and reviews by like-minded folks on this site and I agree with them 100 percent. I do not care to repeat those most obvious train wrecks of movie poop to grace this piece of celluloid.
One point that makes my blood pressure pop every time I think about it is the metallurgy of the Predator's equipment. Why is it that some weapons and armor are not impervious to the acid, yet later some are? Did Anderson realize half way through that maybe he'd actually have to give the Predator a snow balls chance in hell instead of none at all? I'm no expert, but wouldn't it seem likely that a highly intelligent race of galactic hunters would have the forethought to bring weapons and armor that would actually serve a purpose instead of being, simply, flashy show pieces?
My final thought before I go vomit from recalling this movie from my tormented memory is this:
Why would the queen impale a living organism that has one of its young incubating inside of it? In Alien 3 they already showed the queens response to this after Riply's encounter with one. But, in AVP the queen not only kills the last remaining young, but it impales the Predator right in the spot where the embryo is incubating! Think before you say "ACTION" Paul.
One final thing; a bit of advice for Paul. Next time your in Tijuana, leave your "vision" where it belongs, on the beer soaked floor of a cheap Mexican whorehouse; don't waste the moviegoers time and money.