Aww....Come on!Not as bad as Critics think! And, definitely, good enough. This is one of the movie which teaches you not to always believe Roger Edbert.

Rating: 10/10 (17 April 2008)

Its not as bad as people might think. The plot is good,the effects are awesome, and the creature designs...well, a bit exaggerated.... The plot is kinda cheesy for those who hates cheesy movies. I mean, "A girl helps a monster, becoming a hero"(I kinda like that though...) has been done more than once right? Then, this is not the first or worst R-to-PG-13 movie, Did you watch Robocop 3? The 1st one is total violence with x rating, the second is grotesque and violent, the third, just destroy it up..., Robocop 3 receives worse ratings than WARNING: Contain several strong language and spoilers.
AVP:Alien versus Predator. Then, there's Live free or die hard. after AVP. And, people liked LFODH, why not this? Well, perhaps cause AVP:Alien versus Predator was a battle between 2 of the world's scariest monsters!To me, R-To-PG-13 is just mediocre. If you type in AVP:R here at IMDb, you'll see the R-rated sequel with a worse rating(Ha ha ha....)The second one is pointless and has many plot holes. The first one, features awesome CGI and the predator looks like Hercules, and the Aliens were more intelligent, able to free their queen with her own acidic blood. What else could you ask? R-Rating? watch the unrated edition for that man! Not the theatrical version!!!Pointless carnage? Watch the second one, but this first film has its own uniqueness, so stop criticizing it. Its not Uwe boll's movie, and I'm not that fat guy Roger Edbert, who criticizes, a lot! Well, I don't wanna complain about Edbert. Goodbye, give AVO:Alien versus Predator a chance.