Deceiving a lot for all the fans of Alien

Rating: 4/10 (5 March 2006)

Recently, I bought the Alien Quadrilogy collection (I already saw Alien and Alien: Resurrection on TV by the way) I saw Aliens, and it's an incredibly good movie. However, about Alien³, I found the experience very deceiving, cause there's very less action and horror comparing to the 2 first movies, not to mention that on the planet, there's no weapons or modern technology, which makes the film too obscure and fade for the genre.
When Newt and Hicks died in the beginning of the film, I felt sorry for them, but we didn't need a so bad conclusion about all the survivors of the Sulaco. Another thing that deceived me is Lance Henriksen's role as Bishop II, the human inventor of the synthetic Bishop. He told that he was working for the Company, and he wants the Alien queen who's growing inside of Ripley. The synthetic was by the side of Ellen Ripley, and now his creator is against her... This makes nonsense, and the whole experience shocked me a little when watching it.
Oh yes, I saw the special edition of Alien³, and it's far beyond worse than the original film. What a waste of time it was this bunch of acid that falls on your face...
Also, I had the SNES game years ago, and it was very good: we had many Aliens, a new one (the Mother Alien), the same weapons that we saw in previous films and all the stuff that can please you in an action/sci-fi/horror movie. But Alien³ doesn't have this famous stuff, what makes it a deceiving movie.
It's so bad that without this heap crap, Alien: Resurrection wouldn't exist, but now I agree that Alien³ shouldn't exist either. If you want to watch all the Alien movies, ignore this worthless one...
Steve Baillargeon