How the hell is this the second best horror ???

Rating: 4/10 (5 June 2006)

this film was misdirected, unoriginal, cheaply produced and it all showed. the plot line was absolutely atrocious and although the producers may have added in extra splashes of gore to direct attention from the otherwise horrible performing i do not think it can really be considered to be a horror. i accept that it was going to have a challenge to compete with the seemingly unrivalled success of Star Wars (1977) however to expect to actually give George Lucas a run for his money wit this production was ludicrous. i am not quite sure that i have seen another film with quite the level of subordinate scripting and meaning that does not go directly out of its way to be considered as a joke. e.g. scream