Not like the book/game (which is SUPPOSED to be a sequel)

Rating: 2/10 (15 March 2010)

Lets get something straight, most people are reviewing this and saying its horrible because its not like "Alice in Wonderland" (the classic). What Disney and the producer fail to mention is this movie is NOT based on that classic. Which is why so many are confused.
When it was in production the producer (at least at the time) said he based it on two things: A. the comic "Return to Wonderland" B. the game "American Mcgees Alice"
Both of these are very grim and macabre things. So when you see this movie this is obviously not the direction they went it. Which is why the movie flopped. You can't make a "sequal" to a classic movie and try to make it kid friendly but make it like its macabre counter part and then screw around with the story. It just doesn't work. Its like the threw everything in a blender.
The theme they choose to was awful. Example the tiny bodies or Depps god awful character. I love Depp, hes always great in his roles but I don't ever want to see him again in this.
So this is why I gave it a 2. It ONLY gets a 2 because they didn't do a totally bad job with the graphics. Other then that the movie was horrible. I only seen it because my friend wanted to.
Save your money. If you really want to know what Alice does past the classics we know go read the comic or play the older game. You won't be disappointed. This movie is just a blemish in Wonderlands history.