Not so bad

Rating: Null/10 (3 December 2004)

To try and portray this kind of story would be easier as a miniseries. Even three hours is not enough to soak up the details behind who Alexander was. The big disadvantage is using Hopkins to fill in all the details that couldn't be shown.
But as a history lover, I am a bit more biased in favor of a film like this, because I can appreciate what Stone and Farrel attempt in making this movie. Guagamela was a real high point for me, and I just loved the soundtrack. I think a lot of complaints over certain details are a bit ridiculous. Alex was likely bisexual, but then that was the norm for ancient greeks, so I could understand the struggles and subtlties between Alex and Hephastion. If anything, it enhanced Colin's performance, since so little is known about Alexander or most of the people in his life. Even overacting and scene chewing is preferable to nothing. These were the days of epic characters, so I think it suits the actors to play them larger than life.
It's interesting to compare this film to Richard Burton's portrayal (a much cleaner, glam version), and I'm curious to see how DiCaprio handles the role in his version.
It wasn't Stone's best work, but I wouldn't say it is as bad as many so called critics like to think. I would have liked to see more (The conquest of Eqypt, Siege of Tyre, etc) but I was satisfied with the semi-factual presentation it gave. Powerful music, action and imagery mixed with historical moments make it a respectable work