Opinions and the river

Rating: 8/10 (15 January 2005)

I'd seen "Alexander" today, opened IMDb wed, and I'm atonished seeng that the second biggest group of votes here are giving a "1" note to this film. I like the Stone's films, it's not a master piece, but I like it. But in a cinema world where you can see so many bad bad movies, Z movies, so many films only for teenagers, and many other disasters, you NEVER NEVER NEVER can say that "Alexander" is a film for a "1" vote. NEVER. If this film, with a lot of aspects done carefully, better or not, but carefully, you say needs a vote "1", what we would do with all the horrible films you can see everyday on a lot of world TV's?
It's a problem of sort ideas. When the 15% say "1" for this kind of film, you only can think it's because not cinema, only because thinking and ideas out of cinema's world. And this it's a cinema web.
Then you can say if "Alexander" it's a 5 medium note, or 8, or 9, or 4... well, everyone is free for opinion, but in a cinema world with so poor movies, so many poor movies, you NEVER can say "1" if it's not because politic, and the river, the opinion river directed by some interested media.
I's a good film. Not too much great, not to see again and again, but is still higher than teenagers comedies, and a lot of fast-cinema-food of today.