What did I watch?

Rating: 2/10 (22 August 2019)

Terrible acting, terrible cast. Jasmine is not even a persian actor.
The plot compared to the original to the animated is a complete remake of something that were already amazing.
Compared to the animated movie, the facial expressions said so much. I feel like Disney totally lost what's real and put all money on Will Smith, Guy Richie and CGI to think it makes a better movie. This isn't the case, in order to make something great, the acting has to be on spot, the story is super important and the feelings of the acting has to be touching.
When watching this movie, I didn't feel anything. Aladdin is suppose to get you to cry since his a struggeling poor boy who lives on the streets and steels stuff to stay alive. Not this high school musical bs where you think a pretty boy is gonna make up for it. The wideangle is also wrong for this format. A higher mm filmed movie would not show as much of the background, but rather the actors expression, just like the animated movie. THAT'S WHAT WE LIKED WITH THE ORIGINAL, the expressions and feelings between the characters.
I didn't feel like Aladdin or Jasmine had a love connection at all in this movie. People who know love knows this. You know the look you get from someone who loves you? Like a parent. best friend or a partner? That look, wasn't there in ANY of the x-frames of this movie. In the animated it was there every second.
I feel like Disney lost their touch to what made great films. People don't care if you spend 1000000 million dollars on CGI unless the feeling are there. It's funny cause I think you could make a better Aladdin with 10% of the cost of this movie if you actually knew what people like. That's why youtube and other platforms take over even this "well produced" material, people don't care about low budget when the feelings you touch are genuine and is something you can relate to.