NOT a horror film

Rating: 6/10 (13 December 2006)

alright, I'm not going to speak about "gore" or "thrill" i'm just going to talk about the fact that this film is not actually a horror film, but it could have been the best horror film ever done. First of all, being directed by Wes Craven was not the best thing that could have happened to this movie, in fact, it's one of the week points it has. He had the main idea, which was awesome, but the rest sucks. The performances were hideous, and the low budget effects too, i think the only good thing that this movie has is the Robert Englund appearance. But is still a classic, and if I had seen this movie in the time it was released, I'm sure I'd have been scared, and it did gave me the creeps, but not when I was seeing the movie, it was after everything had finished, when I had to go to sleep... If some other person got this movie script and really made an effort to make a non-Hollywood horror film with this, I would pay whatever it costs to see it, because i know it would be great. I mean, come on!!!! a guy that killed little kids, that after being burned alive by your parents follows you in your nightmares!!!! it's great!!! Great but not well done, that's how i describe this movie, I recommend it though, for the reasons I have already explained... Try Again Wes!!!!