Effective - but exaggerated - version of Burgess' novella

Rating: Null/10 (12 June 2001)

Firstly, it may be something of a cliché, but it has to be said: the book is vastly superior to the film, and should ideally be read beforehand. There is the constant danger that the violence and imagery of the movie enthralls to such an extent that the original meaning becomes lost - thus, we end up with psychopaths hailing the film and ignoring its message simply because it is violent and "against the 'norm'", and at the opposite end of the spectrum, people becoming so disgusted by the scenes that they do not care if the film has a message or not.
Incidentally, too much fuss is made over the 21st chapter being omitted in the film as in the US version of the book. Included or not, the film still contains the fundamental message (only to a different extent) that choice is a basic right of all human beings - whatever Alex chooses in the end reinforces this.
But I will try not to dwell on the philosophical aspects of the film too much. Entertainment-wise, "A Clockwork Orange" is a total gross-out. It's recommended for those who are impassive towards, (or, God forbid, in favour of), "ultraviolence". Personally, I think that the violence is exaggerated - the notorious and unnecessary drowning scene leaves you both speechless and wondering, "How did they do that?"
As far as symbolism goes, there is a lot. It will go straight over the heads of some people - it went over mine, and I am studying this book in English Literature class. Nonetheless, it's enjoyable, but should ONLY be taken seriously if you want to fully consider its moral messages, of which there are plenty. Otherwise, just enjoy it and then forget about it.