Kubrick's gone deep inside

Rating: 10/10 (5 January 2004)

Don't you think Kubrick is director(artist) that's gone deeper in man's psychology than anyone else. After watching again ACOrange I am starting to feel it's a universal metaphor of humans trying to get rid of their fix-ideas(=real identity). Although the characters and story are "borrowed" from original book I think that Kubrick's main point was to show(I find Alex as one possible way to see Kubrick's idea in a story) how strong and longlasting man's (unique) identity is and how futile is the INTENTION to change someone (including yourself). Changes come from behind INTENTION is what I want to say.
Do you find it harmful that Alex's (in the movie and outside) identity costs raping, killing... (as a metaphor). I am sorry but I don't. Kubrick's sympathies for him tell me he thinks the same. Because it's REAL, because it's IDENTITY I hear him whispering. Do you?