Deserves No Stars.

Rating: 1/10 (5 October 2008)

I am writing this because I am alarmed at the mentality of some of the IMDb users who have given this film above one solitary star.
There have been some great films over the years, Gladiator and Braveheart are just two examples, and it is not hard to see why. In a nutshell, it is a combination of superb acting and an enticing plot that makes you at one with the cast.
The team that created 300 however, decided to be different. Fair enough, different can work, Clockwork Orange (another great film) is a prime example.
300 did not work though. In a nutshell, it was spoonbendingly dull, with the sort of acting you would expect from a muscular pornstar.
Maybe the whole idea of the film was to be cheesy and terrible to the point where a certain satire is conceived - If this was the case then maybe it works for some, but on behalf of people who understand what a great film is, I give this no stars.
I can only recommend watching it if you want the best example of how bad some films can get.
Otherwise do something more worthwhile, play the piano, watch pornography. Just anything but this awful drivel.