I don't see it.

Rating: 7/10 (1 November 2007)

I know some of my friends and a lot of vampire enthusiasts loved this film, but I don't see it. This whole plot just seems like a vampire re-hash of Night of the Living Dead (and Alive to a lesser extent). I found nothing original in this film other than the geographic location. That gimmick actually failed to click on a lot of levels for me, because it makes the whole film seem like it takes place over one night. I saw little evidence of the passage of time other than Hartnett's facial hair.
The other aspect that failed for me was the romance/sub-plot. I kept wondering why they dabbled into the divorce/separation and never really addressed it. Did they not have enough freaking time in that attic to get their personal business out in the open? "No, I think we should just sit here and stare at each other for a couple of weeks and not talk about the only other plot going on in our film..."
It's a capable film, I assure you. But fresh, original? Haven't found it in here.