Well...

Rating: 1/10 (18 December 2007)

In my opinion, 28 days later wasn't that good a film anyway, but it was bearable to watch, this on the other hand is poor. I cannot stand films that have the "stupid people" in, there is always one that will open a door that they're not supposed to, etc, this film takes it to the extreme, The two kids decide they want to go back to their house, not even thinking about the "zone" that they're supposed to be in, jees i've never ever seen soldiers as blind as that in my life, some parts are pretty bad but there are two that finish it off, 1) They're meant to be guarding the zone, yet two children (who are now like Sam fisher by the way) manage to escape :S OK, one saw them, but the response time was terrible, they could've been infected as soon as they stepped out the containment zone.
2) The room where all of the people are being held to stop the rage virus from spreading. shouldn't they be guarding all doors?, especially a flimsy fire escape, (which by the way "super zombie" appears at) Yes, Robert Carlisle the super zombie, there is no object that can stop it!, it can magic through doors and walls, withstand biological weapons, it can even teleport into whatever scene it sees fit, why is this one zombie intent on finding these survivors anyway? I wouldn't be surprised if it resurrected after the subway incident and teleported to Paris to make the final scene! I wouldn't necessarily call this film a zombie movie, just a cliché filled "horror" zombies in my opinion are slow moving, walking corpses that groan a bit, not psycho Olympic sprinting bloodied men and women, that cough up blood on everything they cannot kill or destroy.
This was also just an excuse to blow up London (poorly i might add) they must have thought, "this film sucks lets blow up the city to make it better" if you wanted dramatic, they could have used a nuke, or a hydrogen fuel bomb =D I'll probably never see this or 28 days later again.