Quick.... Run to another landmark

Rating: 1/10 (5 January 2008)

Apart from an excellent opening scene full of tension which held out the possibility that this might just be a good film, the rest of this film is quite simply ridiculous. It's full of wooden characters and HUGE plot holes. The director seems to have believed that because everyone rated the great panoramas of an empty London from 28 days later he should follow suit on a much grander scale. As a result it seems that the aim of the characters is to run from one landmark to another to fulfil the directors wish to show another aerial shot of London. *Spoilers* And how come Robert Carlyle's rage victim acts completely different from every other rage victim? Rather than wondering around killing everything that moves he manages to know that the secure zone is going to be fire bombed (He hides around a corner with a knowing look on his face, because of course the explosion wouldn't go around a corner would it.....) Then he manages to follow his kids through MASSIVE expanses of London for a final ridiculous fight in the utter darkness of the Underground. So many other stupid plot holes to mention. Zombies, Gore and Aerial shots do not make a good movie by themselves. Very disappointing.