Come on!

Rating: 1/10 (15 September 2010)

I found 28 days later a good movie and expected much from 28 weeks later. It turns out to be a real disappointment.
Starting from the first attack, zombies seemed to come out of nowhere and were highly organized and synchronized. Otherwise why did they attack the same house at the same time in a low population area?
Zombies bite and beat victims so vigorously that the victim should have serve injuries over the body. It is quite impossible to survive the attack, even if the virus is submissive. (And in 28 weeks later, now blood doesn't transmit the disease if not through biting. People can have zombie's blood on face without getting sick.)
After 28 weeks, WHERE did the dead zombies in London city go? The US army took the risk and picked them away 1 by 1? The UK has a population of 62 million, plus a billion mammals. Dead bodies of them will be . If this happens in the real world, the new camp would be built out there in the countryside (even better an island), where zombies have no place to hide, and the old cities will be demolished with hydrogen bombs together with dead zombies, clearing up any potential carrier man or animal.
The worst thing is, someone could meet an EXTREMELY dangerous carrier and *kiss* her. If you won't kiss a rabies carrier, why do you kiss someone much more fatal than that? I really, really don't think we should discuss any further. Everything in this movie happens just because someone wants it happen.
For those who want to know insane and stupid the US army acts in the film: People, aka potential victims/ biter, were half-locked in a room to wait for the zombie to kill. This "half-lock" was unbreakable at first but suddenly opened up after people were bitten. The whole is absurd totally, just to find an excuse to throw new zombies onto the street.
Later, a flying helicopter was used to chop zombies with its rotor. Everyone knows helicopter should avoid being damaged there.
Summing up all these, I call this movie ultra-terrible.