Soon to come - "28 Months Later"???

Rating: 1/10 (12 October 2008)

I thought this might be a decent horror movie, even though the first 10 minutes had the most egregious use of shaky-cam ever. So much so that it gave me a headache.
I've read some of the other negative reviews and they have picked out most of the giant plot holes and idiocies in this movie. This one just piled them on until I was literally angry by the end.
A couple little things I'll add. I find it highly doubtful that the Chief Medical Officer for the containment of the worst danger to humanity ever would be a 28-year-old woman. Not that she was female, but at that age would barely have been out of medical school. You don't put a noob in charge of the most important medical investigation in the history of humanity. I believe she was so cast so that her superior officer could question her judgment and easily ignore her advice. Obviously a super-heroine as well, since they only had 4 minutes to run what seemed like several blocks to the park and she did it after being shot in the leg! And with all the opportunities to explain why the kid was so valuable to evacuate, no one ever once shouted "He's IMMUNE!", which should be the main concern of every living being on the planet, even suspicious helicopter pilots.
Not just a bad movie, but actively bad. Throwing the camera into a crowd of people and having them bump it around is not cinematography. I will say that some of the scenes were lit interestingly, though. That is, when the lights were on. Geez, they never heard of batteries, or flashlights?