Episodic and exploitative cheap flick

Rating: 2/10 (15 June 2003)

There's hardly one good idea in the script. The prologue sets it all: it's ugly and it seems you've seen it umpteen times on TV. Though some images of the deserted London in the beginning are really good. The rest with the 'living dead' is bland: it's been done umpteen times in a better way; I mean scarier, truly involving, really gut-grabbing.
The last part in the castle with the soldiers is kinda ridiculous: THE upper crust of episodic and chaotic script shooting.
When you've got nothing to shoot, don't make movies: simple, ain't?
Over.