28 days later

Rating: 8/10 (18 March 2006)

I have just watched this film and thought it was excellent. I have one or two issues with it. Maybe I an not as good as the director/producer but there were a few inconsistencies. Although I have never been and do nor wish to be in this position, the first thing I think I might do is find somewhere secure and defendable. Then find guns. Why were they walking around with baseball bats and machetes when all the gun shops would have been open for the taking? Next, why did the army have only one of the infected chained to see how long it/they could live without food? Would it not have been better to have two, and see if they could feed off each other? Why was the M-way void of cars, when everywhere else was full of vehicles? And the smell would have been horrendous. We saw people covering their faces a time or two. But would not the whole world have been smelly? At the end of the day, I liked the film. And I advise anybody who has a view on where and when the 'apocalypse' might happen should watch it. Let's hope it isn't that way. The apocalypse, I mean!!!!!!!