Artistic but too slow.

Rating: 7/10 (11 September 2017)

I rarely write reviews. If a movie is really bad or if it's really good I write one. But this, I just had to say the things on my mind. First of all, the first 20 minutes were artistic of course. But making it last 20 minutes? 6 maybe 7 minutes would be enough. Not just the beginning. Basically the whole movie could be a lot shorter. I understand, you put a lot of work into a scene, a movie. And that you did 50 years ago. WOW. But the scenes are just too long and slow. That's the main problem for me. I got bored in those parts that were too long. I watched this movie after I saw a video about Nolan's favorite movies. I guess I understand why a director would love it. It's a piece of art indeed. It just didn't work for me. I'd give it a 5 or 6 bur the cinematography is just WOW. Enjoy.