2001 The best year in Cinema History

Rating: Null/10 (28 April 2002)

I've read some of your comments here and I realized that there's two kind of opinions:The honest one and reviews from disdainful angry people( comments of RSura or Da Reel Nick Carter- see below-).If you don't like this movie I can accept that.BUT I can't accept comments like" this movie is bad or boring" GIVE ME something more clever than that!!!.Don't attack(on)the Filmmaker and his work!.
I say it again "2001" is worth watching it,like BLADE RUNNER,it makes you"wonder" and that is a great quality (and legacy) for a film. Those who think this film is Boring,maybe you are this Arrogant unbearable Star Wars freak fans or "Paulettes"(fans of the old witch critic Pauline Kael).Long Live 2001!!!.
"When you think of the greatest moments of film,I think you are almost always involved with images rather than scenes,and certainly never dialogue.The thing a film does best is to use pictures with music and I think these are the moments you remember.Another thing is the way an actor did something: the way Emil Jannings took out his handkerchief and blew his nose in The Blue Angel,or those marvelous slow turns that,Nikolai Cherkassov did in Ivan The Terrible". --Stanley Kubrick--
Note: IMDB reviewers are like the Mafia ,they only kill each others.