If you're an MTV-generation moron, you're best served with an LSD pill minus this movie.

Rating: Null/10 (30 August 2007)

One of the most visually impressive movies of all time, from the best director. Isn't this common knowledge? As far as the vagueness of the ending (meaning the last half-hour) is concerned, those who want concrete answers in a movie with this kind of theme should: 1) use their imagination, 2) watch an Agatha Christie film instead, in which neat explanations are provided for everything, and 3) go back to watching "Friends", Ben Affleck's movies, or Zemeckis's pathetic "Contact", that pitiful little "imitation" of this classic.
This is not a movie for morons. So if you're a moron - and you know you're a moron - just stay away from this piece of celluloid greatness, because, honestly, it will just confuse your tiny little mind.
The problem is that many morons, apparently, watched this movie, then decided to criticize its pace and story. Of course, when MTV videos are all you ever watch all day, "2001" must seem like a snail going nowhere.