It's not bad, but lacks some things after a big decision

Rating: 8/10 (11 March 2020)

It starts off strong, at least a 9/10 is the beginning, but once a important character becomes left in the wind, it becomes a little bit stale, but I guess the movie needs it to redefine what a war movie means. I just feel there isn't that much to tell the only thing pushing it forward is this guy, who had something terrible happen to him and his friend, a letter, and the camera movements. if the camera movements were just same old Traditional shots we have gotten before, then this movie would have been less than a 6/10 below average war movie, but the camera work REALLY hold this movie up. Films like birdman reminds me of this, however birdman had MUCH better captivating story to be told, the one shot technique didn't hold the film, it was just there for dramatic effect, the film itself is a pulp. This film seems to be WAY too reliable on this technique, and that's ok, because the film wins for this benefit. However if it had better narrative with a better approach it definitely would have remained a 9/10, it just looses its touch, honestly it's barely even a 8/10 but I'll give it the leverage for that camera work, plus IMDb doesn't allow 7.7 7.8 type of scores.