Would YOU believe Cole has come from the future if you were Kathryn?

Rating: Null/10 (10 October 2002)

---MILD SPOILERS---
An interesting plot, dressed in an eccentric manner and mood.
As in all movies that boast more than a Ford model-T newly off an assembly line (any colour as long as it's black) for a plot, the first need for critique concerns the storyline itself. The plot is certainly interesting, but not necessarily confusing if one pays adequate attention. Even after the first miraculous houdini act by Cole, (JC's first miracle?), the viewer is in no doubt that Cole is not insane. At that point, Cathryn swings towards the middle, while Cole is convinced he is not. It's ironic that by the end of the movie Cathryn has swung to full non-insanity to join the viewers' opinion, while Cole is almost certain he's a looney. Kudos to Gilliam for not swinging the cheap pendulum of insanity-or-not for the viewer in favour of brownie points.
The cinematography is solid and indicative of a post-apocalyptic underground world with hints (empty streets, posters, rubbish) flowing even into the present. This world has had it even before the virus-bearing chap went on holidays, which is also verified by the incidental manner in which Gilliam and the authors treat him. No character development, just bare-bones motive and background. The world has had it alright.
Bruce Willis delivers a good performance, such that one might think that the role was created for him. Madeleine Stow tries hard but flings between overacting and boredom. Brad Pitt copes (and copies) adequately.
The demented, pythonesque presentation of the future scientists obviously seen through Coles' demented disposition does not fit well. Keep the viewer stationary Mr Gilliam, this one's a no-no. We at least deserve a decent glimpse into the future, which we could perhaps forgive the lack of, if you cared to excuse yourself because of your low (how low is Â£29m?) budget.
Worthwhile of repeated viewings, and a very good sci-fi flick.