Waste of time

Rating: 1/10 (21 November 2010)

How can you make a movie like this? The ending makes the whole movie watching experience a total waste of time. They could have told this story in a 25 minute episode of The twilight zone. A lot less painful a lot cheaper. With an ending like this you wonder how the movie makers think. Is it like this: "let's make a interesting plot, with good actors and an interesting director. Then let's make it over long - and as a final let us put in a really depressing ending that make the audience think twice about watching another movie. And... we all make a lot of money." The problem is that the audience doesn't make any money - they pay for the spectacle. At least you could respect them enough to give them an intelligent movie with a final that makes sense. I just can't understand why this movie has got so much praise on IMDb? Strange things happen.