12 angry men

Rating: Null/10 (2 November 2010)

I like this book because the story is interesting me, also I like some parts of film, such as: the actor, some details and so on. But I was more likely with the written play, because it was fun that you could imagine what the story was acted, and it was better then the film, because you could use your brain to work on and to know what story was talking about and how they acted. Also, I like juror No.8 in the written play, because he was smart and brave. For example, juror No.8 was the only one to find out the problem of witness's testimony and acted hoe witness could did it. Another example, juror No.8 still insisted his vote, and he changed juror's vote and he saved the accuser's life at the end. I did not like the film because it's black and white, do not have good action, and have a lot of arguing. Also, sometimes the film is not connecting to the book and the film will add something that not belongs to the book. For example, the book did not talk about juror No.3 was crying and changing his vote at the end. And juror No.9 walked to juror No.8 and introduced him then the end. For other reason that I did not like the film because of juror No.3 because his act was so exaggerate and he cannot without his personal emotion. Such as: in Act 2, juror No.8 said that you want to see this boy die because you personally want it, then juror No.3 started to shouting and slapped on the desk said, " I'll kill you, I'll kill you."