*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Rating: 8/10 (5 November 2010)

The Movie Twelve Angry Men was a good movie. The plot of the movie was good. It was interesting to watch. What I didn't like was the movie was black and white, the actors were not that good at acting, and there wasn't any woman juror in the movie. The interesting part was how everyone thought the boy is guilty at the first except no.8, without even thinking and knowing anything about the case. But they changed their mind after talking and arguing with each other. And it was surprising how the boy was described in the written play actually he is totally different. He looks like an innocent little boy in the movie. In the movie the acting wasn't so good for example how the jurors were arguing and talking, it looked fake. It's a 50's movie that's why the sound system wasn't that good either. Also the jury room looked fake, how the inside of the room was. Altogether the movie was good but I didn't like the way it was made. And the most important thing was there wasn't any action in the movie which didn't impress the audiences. But definitely I would say it was better than the actual written play. So you can see what's going on in the movie instead of reading and imagining on your head.