The very precise example of reasonable doubt

Rating: 10/10 (23 May 2017)

In this movie, it is flawlessly shown that when big deals are involved, no matter how uncanny the evidence may appear at first, there should be some time allocated to think about others' conclusion and look at it from an angle that questions its truth value.
But a man mustn't deny the truthfulness of a matter just for the sake of unity with others, or to put it better, to fit in. This is clearly seen at approximately 1:46 in the movie when juror 11 talks to juror 3 that I will type the exact conversation for better influence down below:
Juror 11: He's right, that's not an answer. What kind of a man are you? You have sat here and voted guilty with everyone else because there are some baseball tickets burning a hole in your pocket. And now you've changed your vote because you say you are sick of all the talking here?
Juror 3: Ah listen, buddy...
Juror 11: Who tells you that you have the right to play like this with a man's life? Don't you care...
Juror 3: Now wait a minute. You can't talk like that to me!
Juror 11: I can talk like that to you. If you want to vote "not guilty" then do it because you are convinced the man is not guilty not because you've had enough. And if you think he is guilty then vote that way. Don't you have the guts to do what you think is right?
Another lesson from this movie is always to put yourself in the shoes of someone you are trying to judge. Which I believe is shown at roughly 1:12 in the movie when juror 8 talks to juror 4 about his weekly schedule and asks about a few nights back when he had seen a movie and that he can't remember the plot or even the name of that movie. And the sound of something breaking inside juror 4 is heard when a bead of cold sweat runs down his forehead.
Another thing that was worthy of attention in this film was the fan that didn't work. While most of the men in the jury room were hot and complaining about the warmth of the room and one of them saying this is gonna be the hottest day of the year (and not likely to change). And when it gets dark and they have to turn on the lights, they discover that now the fan actually works. I think these two change of situations are two main ways to look at the whole shape of the movie. The change in the weather (which no one, not even the weather bureau, could predict) symbolizes the whole change in the overall vote of the jurors. And the whole "fan situation" is trying to tell that some light shed on a problem, can change everything.