M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.
[2023] 6 S.C.R. 570, Supreme Court of India, 2023
Outcome: Disposed off
Segment: Body
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
570
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2023] 6 S.C.R.
   [2023] 6 S.C.R. 570
570
M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI
v.
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.
(Miscellaneous Application No. 1278 of 2023)
In
(Criminal Appeal No. 1434 of 2023)
MAY 17, 2023
[KRISHNA MURARI AND SANJAY KUMAR, JJ.]
Judgments/Orders – Modification of – Vide order dtd.
09.05.2023 passed by Supreme Court, the condition imposed upon
the appellant to furnish a bank guarantee for release of the sum of
Rs.38.52 crore was set aside – Appellant was permitted to withdraw
the said amount along with 4 percent simple interest payable from
08.05.2006 till the date of actual payment – Modification sought
by appellant, in view of various orders passed earlier by the
Securities Appellate Tribunal and Supreme Court, directing the sale
proceeds (which ultimately aggregated to Rs.38.52 crore) to be
placed in bank fixed deposits so as to garner a higher rate of interest
– Allowed – Appellant permitted to unconditionally withdraw the
aforesaid amount along with the fixed deposit interest amount
accrued thereon.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION :  Miscellaneous
Application No.1278 of 2023 In Criminal Appeal No.1434 of 2023.
From the Judgment and Order dated 09.05.2023 in Crl. A. No.1434
of 2023 of the Supreme Court of India.
Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Nupur Kumar,
Divyansh Tiwari, M. Thangathurai, Ms. Priyansha Sharma, Ms. Diksha
Dadu, Advs. for the Appellant.
K M Nataraj, ASG, Rajesh Ranjan, Mukul
Singh, Shailesh Madiyal,
Pratyush Shrivastav, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Ms.
Devyani Bhatt, M/s. K J John and Co., Advs. for the Respondents.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
571
The following Order of the Court was passed:
O R D E R
IA No. 100413/2023 in M.A. No. 1278/2023
By way of this application, the appellant seeks modification of the
order dated 09.05.2023 passed by this Court allowing the appeal. Thereby,
the condition imposed upon the appellant by the Courts below to furnish
a bank guarantee for release of the sum of  38.52 crore was set aside
and the appellant was permitted to withdraw the said amount along with
4 percent simple interest payable from 08.05.2006 till the date of actual
payment.
2. While so, the appellant produced copies of various orders passed
earlier, be it by the Securities Appellate  Tribunal  or  by  this  Court,
directing  the  sale proceeds, which ultimately aggregated to  38.52
crore, to be placed in bank fixed deposits so as to garner a higher rate of
interest. Reference in this regard may be made to the order dated
08.05.2006 of the Securities Appellate Tribunal and the orders dated
05.12.2008, 14.05.2009 & 16.11.2009 passed by this Court.
3. In that view of the matter, the final order dated 09.05.2023
passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1434 of 2023 shall stand modified by
substituting para 21 therein as under:
“21. As a consequence, the appellant shall be permitted to
unconditionally withdraw the aforesaid amount along with the fixed deposit
interest amount that has accrued thereon.”
4. IA No. 100413/2023 is allowed and, in consequence, M.A. No.
1278/2023 stands disposed of.
Divya Pandey
Application
disposed of.
(Assisted by : Roopanshi Virang, LCRA)
M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI  v. CENTRAL BUREAU
OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.